VS
Compare iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index ETF (XMU.U) vs iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMU.U and XMS provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XMU.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.3% for XMS. Performance-wise, XMU.U has returned 5.34% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas XMS is at 4.18% with +$10 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMU.U
XMS
| AuM | $4.98 M | $69.41 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.30% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.33% | 0.33% |
| Tracking Difference | - | 0.32% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMU.U | -1.74% | +4.66% | +5.34% | +6.25% | +36.06% |
XMS | -1.54% | +3.53% | +4.18% | +4.79% | +30.53% | |
| Flows | XMU.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$2 M | -$3 M |
XMS | +$6 M | +$16 M | +$10 M | +$18 M | +$10 M |
XMU.U vs XMS exposure
Countries
XMU.U
USA
93.25%
XMS
USA
92.07%
Other
7.93%
Sectors
XMU.U
Technology
29.58%
Finance
14.51%
Healthcare
13.49%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.04%
Other
31.38%
XMS
Technology
29.21%
Finance
14.32%
Healthcare
13.32%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.90%
Other
32.25%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMU.U
Microsoft Corp.
1.58%
Welltower, Inc.
1.58%
Amphenol Corp.
1.57%
Chubb Ltd.
1.54%
Johnson & Johnson
1.54%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.47%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.47%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.46%
The Southern Co.
1.44%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.43%
XMS
Microsoft Corp.
1.56%
Welltower, Inc.
1.56%
Amphenol Corp.
1.55%
Chubb Ltd.
1.52%
Johnson & Johnson
1.52%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.46%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.45%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.44%
The Southern Co.
1.42%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.42%
Diversification
XMU.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 165 total
15.08%
XMS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 165 total
14.89%
Characteristics
Compare
XMU.U
XMS
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.13% | 1.17% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 22, 2019 | April 5, 2016 |
Frequently asked questions about XMU.U and XMS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMU.U or XMS?
As of September 17, 2026, XMU.U has returned 5.34% year to date, while XMS has returned 4.18%. XMU.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMU.U or XMS?
As of September 17, 2026, XMU.U manages $4.98 M in assets, while XMS manages $69.41 M. XMS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMU.U and XMS managed?
XMU.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XMS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XMU.U and XMS emphasize?
XMU.U is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. XMS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMU.U or XMS?
Year to date, XMU.U has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$10.10 M for XMS. XMS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMU.U and XMS compare?
XMU.U has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while XMS has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
What are the top holdings of XMU.U and XMS?
XMU.U's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Welltower, Inc., and Amphenol Corp.. XMS's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Welltower, Inc., and Amphenol Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMU.U or XMS?
XMU.U holds 165 securities, while XMS holds 165. On holdings count, XMU.U is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.