XMU.U
iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index ETF

Full XMU.U fund page
VS
XMU
iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index ETF

Full XMU fund page

Compare iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index ETF (XMU.U) vs iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index ETF (XMU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMU.U and XMU provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XMU.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.3% for XMU. Performance-wise, XMU.U has returned 5.71% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas XMU is at 7.86% with -$39 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XMU.U
-1.27%+4.66%+5.71%+6.75%+36.54%
XMU
-0.42%+4.40%+7.86%+8.47%+41.53%
Flows
XMU.U
+$0 M+$0 M+$0 M-$2 M-$3 M
XMU
+$7 M+$23 M-$39 M-$39 M-$105 M

XMU.U vs XMU exposure

Countries

XMU.U
USA
93.25%
XMU
USA
93.25%

Sectors

XMU.U
Technology
29.58%
Finance
14.51%
Healthcare
13.49%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.04%
Other
31.38%
XMU
Technology
29.58%
Finance
14.51%
Healthcare
13.49%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.04%
Other
31.38%
As of September 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XMU.U
Microsoft Corp.
1.58%
Welltower, Inc.
1.58%
Amphenol Corp.
1.57%
Chubb Ltd.
1.54%
Johnson & Johnson
1.54%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.47%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.47%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.46%
The Southern Co.
1.44%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.43%
XMU
Microsoft Corp.
1.58%
Welltower, Inc.
1.58%
Amphenol Corp.
1.57%
Chubb Ltd.
1.54%
Johnson & Johnson
1.54%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.47%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.47%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.46%
The Southern Co.
1.44%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.43%

Diversification

XMU.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 165 total
15.08%
XMU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 165 total
15.08%

Characteristics

Compare
XMU.U
XMU
ProvideriSharesiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CADMSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.13%1.12%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 22, 2019July 24, 2012

Frequently asked questions about XMU.U and XMU

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMU.U or XMU?
As of September 17, 2026, XMU.U has returned 5.71% year to date, while XMU has returned 7.86%. XMU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMU.U or XMU?
As of September 17, 2026, XMU.U manages $5.00 M in assets, while XMU manages $362.29 M. XMU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMU.U and XMU managed?
XMU.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XMU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XMU.U and XMU emphasize?
XMU.U is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. XMU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMU.U or XMU?
Year to date, XMU.U has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with -$38.69 M for XMU. XMU.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMU.U and XMU compare?
XMU.U has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while XMU has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
What are the top holdings of XMU.U and XMU?
XMU.U's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Welltower, Inc., and Amphenol Corp.. XMU's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Welltower, Inc., and Amphenol Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMU.U or XMU?
XMU.U holds 165 securities, while XMU holds 165. On holdings count, XMU.U is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XMU.U and XMU

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds