VS
When evaluating costs, XMW features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.45% for FCIV. Performance-wise, XMW has returned 7.95% year-to-date with -$21 M in net flows, whereas FCIV is at 19.23% with +$937 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMW
FCIV
| AuM | $175.35 M | $2,582.66 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.48% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.52% | -1.37% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMW | -0.68% | +3.08% | +7.95% | +5.87% | +38.20% |
FCIV | -1.18% | +5.45% | +19.23% | +29.75% | +86.62% | |
| Flows | XMW | +$0 M | -$6 M | -$21 M | -$44 M | -$43 M |
FCIV | +$90 M | +$250 M | +$937 M | +$1,247 M | +$1,898 M |
XMW vs FCIV exposure
Countries
XMW
USA
55.95%
Japan
9.99%
Other
34.06%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
XMW
Technology
23.71%
Finance
14.26%
Healthcare
13.81%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.73%
Telecommunications
9.99%
Utilities
7.16%
Other
20.34%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMW
Johnson & Johnson
1.56%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.43%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.21%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.20%
Microsoft Corp.
1.17%
Cencora, Inc.
1.13%
KDDI Corp.
1.10%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.10%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.08%
The Southern Co.
1.08%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
XMW
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 379 total
12.06%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
XMW
FCIV
| Provider | iShares | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD | Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.41% | 2.12% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 24, 2012 | June 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about XMW and FCIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMW or FCIV?
As of September 11, 2026, XMW has returned 7.95% year to date, while FCIV has returned 19.23%. FCIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMW or FCIV?
As of September 11, 2026, XMW manages $175.35 M in assets, while FCIV manages $2.58 B. FCIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMW and FCIV managed?
XMW is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. FCIV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMW or FCIV?
Year to date, XMW has seen -$20.52 M in net flows, compared with +$937.28 M for FCIV. FCIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMW and FCIV compare?
XMW has an expense ratio of 0.48%, while FCIV has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Recent articles about XMW and FCIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.