VS
Compare iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF (XQLT) vs Desjardins RI USA - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XQLT provides Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while DRMU is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XQLT features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.2% for DRMU. Performance-wise, XQLT has returned 18.42% year-to-date with +$31 M in net flows, whereas DRMU is at 15.31% with -$189 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XQLT
DRMU
| AuM | $274.91 M | $97.02 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.32% | 0.23% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.22% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XQLT | -0.50% | +2.58% | +18.42% | +17.37% | +72.69% |
DRMU | -2.26% | +0.57% | +15.31% | +13.47% | +81.05% | |
| Flows | XQLT | +$6 M | +$7 M | +$31 M | +$25 M | +$116 M |
DRMU | +$0 M | -$237 M | -$189 M | -$195 M | -$150 M |
XQLT vs DRMU exposure
Countries
XQLT
USA
95.88%
DRMU
USA
97.03%
Sectors
XQLT
Technology
50.60%
Finance
12.02%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.43%
Healthcare
9.38%
Other
18.57%
DRMU
Technology
47.12%
Finance
12.58%
Healthcare
9.25%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.67%
Industrials
7.47%
Other
14.91%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XQLT
US46432F3394
99.93%
DRMU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.91%
Apple, Inc.
7.35%
Microsoft Corp.
5.42%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.45%
Broadcom Inc.
2.43%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.37%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.82%
Tesla, Inc.
1.52%
Diversification
XQLT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 119 total
99.93%
DRMU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 493 total
37.91%
Characteristics
Compare
XQLT
DRMU
| Provider | iShares | Desjardins Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Other | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.57% | 1.14% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | September 10, 2019 | September 27, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about XQLT and DRMU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XQLT or DRMU?
As of November 11, 2026, XQLT has returned 18.42% year to date, while DRMU has returned 15.31%. XQLT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XQLT or DRMU?
As of November 11, 2026, XQLT manages $274.91 M in assets, while DRMU manages $97.02 M. XQLT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XQLT and DRMU managed?
XQLT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CAD benchmark. DRMU is actively managed by Desjardins Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is more diversified: XQLT or DRMU?
XQLT holds 1 securities, while DRMU holds 488. On holdings count, DRMU is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XQLT or DRMU?
Year to date, XQLT has seen +$31.01 M in net flows, compared with -$188.77 M for DRMU. XQLT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XQLT and DRMU compare?
XQLT has an expense ratio of 0.32%, while DRMU has an expense ratio of 0.23%.
What sectors do XQLT and DRMU emphasize?
XQLT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. DRMU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Recent articles about XQLT and DRMU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.