VS
Compare iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF (XQLT) vs BMO MSCI USA ESG Leaders Index ETF (ESGY.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XQLT provides Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while ESGY.F is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XQLT features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.2% for ESGY.F. Performance-wise, XQLT has returned 18.42% year-to-date with +$31 M in net flows, whereas ESGY.F is at 8.39% with -$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XQLT
ESGY.F
| AuM | $274.91 M | $5.60 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.32% | 0.23% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.22% | -0.20% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XQLT | -0.50% | +2.58% | +18.42% | +17.37% | +72.69% |
ESGY.F | -4.14% | -3.24% | +8.39% | +8.67% | +66.79% | |
| Flows | XQLT | +$6 M | +$7 M | +$31 M | +$25 M | +$116 M |
ESGY.F | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$2 M | -$2 M | -$3 M |
XQLT vs ESGY.F exposure
Countries
XQLT
USA
95.88%
ESGY.F
USA
96.39%
Sectors
XQLT
Technology
50.60%
Finance
12.02%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.43%
Healthcare
9.38%
Other
18.57%
ESGY.F
Technology
48.88%
Finance
12.02%
Healthcare
10.72%
Industrials
7.66%
Other
20.72%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XQLT
US46432F3394
99.93%
ESGY.F
NVIDIA Corp.
15.11%
Microsoft Corp.
10.40%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.78%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.57%
Tesla, Inc.
2.92%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.86%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.72%
Johnson & Johnson
1.86%
Visa, Inc.
1.75%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.32%
Diversification
XQLT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 119 total
99.93%
ESGY.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 248 total
49.29%
Characteristics
Compare
XQLT
ESGY.F
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CAD | MSCI USA Selection NTR Index - CAD Hedged |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.57% | 0.67% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | September 10, 2019 | February 12, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XQLT and ESGY.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XQLT or ESGY.F?
As of November 11, 2026, XQLT has returned 18.42% year to date, while ESGY.F has returned 8.39%. XQLT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XQLT or ESGY.F?
As of November 11, 2026, XQLT manages $274.91 M in assets, while ESGY.F manages $5.60 M. XQLT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XQLT and ESGY.F managed?
XQLT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CAD benchmark. ESGY.F is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI USA Selection NTR Index - CAD Hedged benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XQLT or ESGY.F?
XQLT holds 1 securities, while ESGY.F holds 246. On holdings count, ESGY.F is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XQLT or ESGY.F?
Year to date, XQLT has seen +$31.01 M in net flows, compared with -$2.40 M for ESGY.F. XQLT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XQLT and ESGY.F compare?
XQLT has an expense ratio of 0.32%, while ESGY.F has an expense ratio of 0.23%.
What sectors do XQLT and ESGY.F emphasize?
XQLT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ESGY.F is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Recent articles about XQLT and ESGY.F
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.