VS
Compare iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF (XQLT) vs Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XQLT provides Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while HULC is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XQLT features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.09% for HULC. Performance-wise, XQLT has returned 18.42% year-to-date with +$31 M in net flows, whereas HULC is at 16.53% with +$265 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XQLT
HULC
| AuM | $274.91 M | $905.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.32% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.22% | -0.08% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XQLT | -0.50% | +2.58% | +18.42% | +17.37% | +72.69% |
HULC | -2.23% | +1.03% | +16.53% | +14.16% | +85.31% | |
| Flows | XQLT | +$6 M | +$7 M | +$31 M | +$25 M | +$116 M |
HULC | +$40 M | +$96 M | +$265 M | +$299 M | +$164 M |
XQLT vs HULC exposure
Countries
XQLT
USA
95.88%
HULC
USA
96.40%
Sectors
XQLT
Technology
50.60%
Finance
12.02%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.43%
Healthcare
9.38%
Other
18.57%
HULC
Technology
47.52%
Finance
12.37%
Healthcare
9.33%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.42%
Industrials
7.34%
Other
15.02%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XQLT
US46432F3394
99.93%
HULC
NVIDIA Corp.
8.03%
Apple, Inc.
7.20%
Microsoft Corp.
5.68%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.63%
Broadcom Inc.
2.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.41%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.81%
Tesla, Inc.
1.64%
Diversification
XQLT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 119 total
99.93%
HULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 494 total
38.54%
Characteristics
Compare
XQLT
HULC
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CAD | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 10, 2019 | February 6, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about XQLT and HULC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XQLT or HULC?
As of November 11, 2026, XQLT has returned 18.42% year to date, while HULC has returned 16.53%. XQLT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XQLT or HULC?
As of November 11, 2026, XQLT manages $274.91 M in assets, while HULC manages $905.27 M. HULC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XQLT and HULC managed?
XQLT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CAD benchmark. HULC is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XQLT or HULC?
XQLT holds 1 securities, while HULC holds 491. On holdings count, HULC is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XQLT or HULC?
Year to date, XQLT has seen +$31.01 M in net flows, compared with +$265.08 M for HULC. HULC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XQLT and HULC compare?
XQLT has an expense ratio of 0.32%, while HULC has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What sectors do XQLT and HULC emphasize?
XQLT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. HULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Recent articles about XQLT and HULC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.