VS
Compare iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF (XQLT) vs TD S&P 500 Index ETF (THU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XQLT and THU provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, XQLT features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.06% for THU. Performance-wise, XQLT has returned 12.8% year-to-date with +$26 M in net flows, whereas THU is at 10.66% with -$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XQLT
THU
| AuM | $256.97 M | $153.50 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.06% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.32% | 0.07% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.25% | -0.15% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XQLT | -2.25% | +0.00% | +12.80% | +16.66% | +67.70% |
THU | -2.21% | +0.56% | +10.66% | +13.94% | +68.14% | |
| Flows | XQLT | +$1 M | +$3 M | +$26 M | +$22 M | +$112 M |
THU | +$1 M | +$2 M | -$1 M | +$7 M | +$78 M |
XQLT vs THU exposure
Countries
XQLT
USA
95.61%
THU
USA
96.42%
Sectors
XQLT
Technology
47.37%
Finance
12.81%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.49%
Healthcare
9.10%
Other
20.23%
THU
Technology
44.01%
Finance
13.36%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.12%
Healthcare
8.97%
Industrials
8.11%
Other
16.44%
As of September 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XQLT
Apple, Inc.
7.18%
Microsoft Corp.
6.96%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.69%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
4.03%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.69%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.57%
Lam Research Corp.
3.55%
Visa, Inc.
3.17%
Applied Materials, Inc.
3.07%
KLA Corp.
2.44%
THU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.16%
Apple, Inc.
6.74%
Microsoft Corp.
5.20%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.99%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.76%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.86%
Tesla, Inc.
1.59%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.48%
Diversification
XQLT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 126 total
43.35%
THU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 506 total
36.70%
Characteristics
Compare
XQLT
THU
| Provider | iShares | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CAD | Solactive US Large Cap Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.61% | 0.96% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 10, 2019 | March 22, 2016 |
Frequently asked questions about XQLT and THU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XQLT or THU?
As of September 14, 2026, XQLT has returned 12.80% year to date, while THU has returned 10.66%. XQLT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XQLT or THU?
As of September 14, 2026, XQLT manages $256.97 M in assets, while THU manages $153.50 M. XQLT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XQLT and THU managed?
XQLT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CAD benchmark. THU is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XQLT and THU emphasize?
XQLT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. THU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XQLT or THU?
Year to date, XQLT has seen +$25.63 M in net flows, compared with -$0.91 M for THU. XQLT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XQLT and THU compare?
XQLT has an expense ratio of 0.32%, while THU has an expense ratio of 0.07%.
What are the top holdings of XQLT and THU?
XQLT's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and NVIDIA Corp.. THU's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XQLT or THU?
XQLT holds 125 securities, while THU holds 502. On holdings count, THU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XQLT and THU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.