XQLT
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF

Full XQLT fund page
VS
XMV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF

Full XMV fund page

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF (XQLT) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF (XMV) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XQLT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while XMV leans towards Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, XQLT features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.3% for XMV. Performance-wise, XQLT has returned 15.47% year-to-date with +$29 M in net flows, whereas XMV is at 14.6% with -$28 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 28, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XQLT
-0.81%+1.79%+15.47%+13.54%+78.82%
XMV
+3.48%-0.21%+14.60%+19.84%+83.78%
Flows
XQLT
+$5 M+$4 M+$29 M+$26 M+$115 M
XMV
+$0 M-$9 M-$28 M-$28 M+$72 M

XQLT vs XMV exposure

Countries

XQLT
USA
95.85%
XMV
Canada
94.94%

Sectors

XQLT
Technology
48.71%
Finance
12.77%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.56%
Healthcare
9.45%
Other
19.51%
XMV
Finance
35.96%
Energy
16.24%
Non-Energy Materials
9.34%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.91%
Industrials
7.70%
Other
21.86%
As of October 28, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XQLT
US46432F3394
99.97%
XMV
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.15%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
3.09%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.05%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.98%
Fortis, Inc.
2.97%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.
2.97%
Canadian National Railway Co.
2.96%
Bank of Montreal
2.93%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.91%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
2.87%

Diversification

XQLT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 119 total
99.97%
XMV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 70 total
29.88%

Characteristics

Compare
XQLT
XMV
ProvideriSharesiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CADMSCI Canada Minimum Volatility Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.59%2.05%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 10, 2019July 24, 2012

Frequently asked questions about XQLT and XMV

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XQLT or XMV?
As of October 28, 2026, XQLT has returned 15.47% year to date, while XMV has returned 14.60%. XQLT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XQLT or XMV?
As of October 28, 2026, XQLT manages $266.54 M in assets, while XMV manages $389.19 M. XMV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XQLT and XMV managed?
XQLT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CAD benchmark. XMV is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI Canada Minimum Volatility Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XQLT or XMV?
XQLT holds 1 securities, while XMV holds 70. On holdings count, XMV is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XQLT or XMV?
Year to date, XQLT has seen +$29.47 M in net flows, compared with -$28.14 M for XMV. XQLT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XQLT and XMV compare?
XQLT has an expense ratio of 0.32%, while XMV has an expense ratio of 0.34%.
What sectors do XQLT and XMV emphasize?
XQLT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. XMV is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials.

Recent articles about XQLT and XMV

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds