XQLT
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF

Full XQLT fund page
VS
XMV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF

Full XMV fund page

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF (XQLT) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF (XMV) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XQLT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Communication Services, while XMV leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, XQLT features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.3% for XMV. Performance-wise, XQLT has returned 3.51% year-to-date with +$20 M in net flows, whereas XMV is at 5.54% with +$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0246810%Mar 30Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 28, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XQLT
+8.39%+1.55%+3.51%+20.98%+68.24%
XMV
+3.53%+4.63%+5.54%+22.92%+58.36%
Flows
XQLT
+$9 M+$18 M+$20 M+$26 M+$107 M
XMV
+$0 M+$11 M+$11 M+$44 M+$98 M

XQLT vs XMV exposure

Countries

XQLT
USA
94.53%
XMV
Canada
99.72%

Sectors

XQLT
Information Technology
36.19%
Consumer Discretionary
10.68%
Communication Services
9.74%
Health Care
9.70%
Industrials
8.20%
Other
25.49%
XMV
Financials
30.96%
Energy
14.63%
Materials
10.97%
Other
8.89%
Utilities
7.77%
Consumer Staples
7.35%
Other
19.42%
As of April 28, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XQLT
APPLE
6.32%
NVIDIA
6.13%
MICROSOFT-T
4.93%
META PLATFORMS
3.52%
TJX
3.50%
LILLY
3.10%
VISA INCORPORATION
3.05%
US5128073062
2.88%
KLA CORPORATION
2.53%
MASTERCARD
2.46%
XMV
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.27%
ENBRIDGE
3.21%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
3.11%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.99%
FORTIS
2.98%
TORONTO DOMINION
2.98%
GREAT WEST LIFECO
2.93%
BANK OF MONTREAL
2.92%
ROYAL BK CANADA
2.91%
CDN NATL RAILWAY
2.83%

Diversification

XQLT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 122 total
38.42%
XMV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 71 total
30.12%

Characteristics

Compare
XQLT
XMV
ProvideriSharesiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CADMSCI Canada Minimum Volatility Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.67%2.16%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 10, 2019July 24, 2012

Frequently asked questions about XQLT and XMV

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XQLT or XMV?
As of April 28, 2026, XQLT has returned 3.51% year to date, while XMV has returned 5.54%. XMV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XQLT or XMV?
As of April 28, 2026, XQLT manages $230.77 M in assets, while XMV manages $399.84 M. XMV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XQLT and XMV managed?
XQLT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality NTR Index - CAD benchmark. XMV is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI Canada Minimum Volatility Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XQLT and XMV emphasize?
XQLT is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Communication Services. XMV is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XQLT or XMV?
Year to date, XQLT has seen +$20.04 M in net flows, compared with +$11.14 M for XMV. XQLT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XQLT and XMV compare?
XQLT has an expense ratio of 0.32%, while XMV has an expense ratio of 0.34%.
What are the top holdings of XQLT and XMV?
XQLT's largest holdings include APPLE and NVIDIA. XMV's top holdings include SUNCOR ENERGY and ENBRIDGE.
Which ETF is more diversified: XQLT or XMV?
XQLT holds 117 securities, while XMV holds 64. On holdings count, XQLT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XQLT and XMV

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds