XSMC
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF

Full XSMC fund page
VS
RSSX
Global X Russell 2000 Index ETF

Full RSSX fund page

Compare iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC) vs Global X Russell 2000 Index ETF (RSSX) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XSMC provides Finance, Technology, and Industrials exposures, while RSSX is primarily weighted in Finance, Healthcare, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XSMC features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.25% for RSSX. Performance-wise, XSMC has returned 28.71% year-to-date with +$12 M in net flows, whereas RSSX is at 22.75% with +$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27Aug 4

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of August 4, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XSMC
+1.24%+14.34%+28.71%+39.69%+58.68%
RSSX
+0.78%+8.73%+22.75%+37.50%-
Flows
XSMC
+$2 M+$6 M+$12 M+$13 M+$44 M
RSSX
+$15 M+$15 M+$7 M+$20 M-

XSMC vs RSSX exposure

Countries

XSMC
USA
99.41%
RSSX
USA
93.42%

Sectors

XSMC
Finance
25.45%
Technology
13.58%
Industrials
12.67%
Healthcare
12.19%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.93%
Other
28.18%
RSSX
Finance
25.55%
Healthcare
19.54%
Technology
12.14%
Industrials
11.16%
Other
31.61%
As of August 4, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XSMC
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
1.96%
FormFactor, Inc.
0.67%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.66%
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
0.64%
Argan, Inc.
0.60%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.60%
Element Solutions, Inc.
0.59%
MaxLinear, Inc.
0.58%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.53%
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
0.49%
RSSX
Moog, Inc.
0.38%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.36%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.35%
Argan, Inc.
0.34%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.33%
Riot Platforms, Inc.
0.31%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.31%
JFrog Ltd.
0.31%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.30%
MaxLinear, Inc.
0.29%

Diversification

XSMC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 604 total
7.33%
RSSX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,907 total
3.28%

Characteristics

Compare
XSMC
RSSX
ProvideriSharesGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P SmallCap 600 Index - USDRussell 2000 RIC Capped Index - USD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.85%1.60%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 10, 2019November 7, 2024

Frequently asked questions about XSMC and RSSX

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XSMC or RSSX?
As of August 4, 2026, XSMC has returned 28.71% year to date, while RSSX has returned 22.75%. XSMC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XSMC or RSSX?
As of August 4, 2026, XSMC manages $105.28 M in assets, while RSSX manages $48.67 M. XSMC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XSMC and RSSX managed?
XSMC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index - USD benchmark. RSSX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XSMC and RSSX emphasize?
XSMC is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials. RSSX is most exposed to Finance, Healthcare, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XSMC or RSSX?
Year to date, XSMC has seen +$11.52 M in net flows, compared with +$7.31 M for RSSX. XSMC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XSMC and RSSX compare?
XSMC has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while RSSX has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XSMC and RSSX?
XSMC's largest holdings include BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, FormFactor, Inc., and ViaSat, Inc.. RSSX's top holdings include Moog, Inc., Cytokinetics, Inc., and BrightSpring Health Services, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XSMC or RSSX?
XSMC holds 602 securities, while RSSX holds 1890. On holdings count, RSSX is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XSMC and RSSX

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds