XSMH
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF

Full XSMH fund page
VS
XSU
iShares U.S. Small Cap Index ETF

Full XSU fund page

iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMH) and iShares U.S. Small Cap Index ETF (XSU) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XSMH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Industrials, while XSU leans towards Finance, Healthcare, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XSMH features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.35% for XSU. Performance-wise, XSMH has returned 14.85% year-to-date with -$21 M in net flows, whereas XSU is at 12.44% with -$114 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 27, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XSMH
+1.47%-4.31%+14.85%+13.97%+56.91%
XSU
-0.13%-4.67%+12.44%+10.51%+68.57%
Flows
XSMH
-$6 M-$5 M-$21 M-$26 M+$26 M
XSU
-$17 M-$91 M-$114 M-$88 M-$23 M

XSMH vs XSU exposure

Countries

XSMH
USA
99.70%
XSU
USA
94.74%

Sectors

XSMH
Finance
26.23%
Technology
12.84%
Industrials
12.26%
Healthcare
10.93%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.86%
Other
29.88%
XSU
Finance
25.98%
Healthcare
20.63%
Technology
11.77%
Industrials
10.31%
Other
31.30%
As of October 27, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XSMH
US4642878049
99.95%
XSU
US4642876555
99.74%

Diversification

XSMH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 603 total
99.95%
XSU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,953 total
99.74%

Characteristics

Compare
XSMH
XSU
ProvideriSharesiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P SmallCap 600 Index - CAD HedgedRussell 2000 CAD Hedged NTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherOther
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.97%0.80%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 10, 2019May 14, 2007

Frequently asked questions about XSMH and XSU

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XSMH or XSU?
As of October 27, 2026, XSMH has returned 14.85% year to date, while XSU has returned 12.44%. XSMH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XSMH or XSU?
As of October 27, 2026, XSMH manages $50.63 M in assets, while XSU manages $638.29 M. XSU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XSMH and XSU managed?
XSMH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index - CAD Hedged benchmark. XSU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the Russell 2000 CAD Hedged NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XSMH or XSU?
XSMH holds 1 securities, while XSU holds 1. On holdings count, XSMH is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XSMH or XSU?
Year to date, XSMH has seen -$20.92 M in net flows, compared with -$114.25 M for XSU. XSMH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XSMH and XSU compare?
XSMH has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while XSU has an expense ratio of 0.36%.
What sectors do XSMH and XSU emphasize?
XSMH is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials. XSU is most exposed to Finance, Healthcare, and Technology.

Recent articles about XSMH and XSU

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds