VS
Compare iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (XSPC) vs CI U.S. 1000 Index ETF (CUSM.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XSPC and CUSM.B provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XSPC features a management fee (MER) of 0.12%, compared to 0.16% for CUSM.B. Performance-wise, XSPC has returned 12.51% year-to-date with -$45 M in net flows, whereas CUSM.B is at 16.46% with +$28 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XSPC
CUSM.B
| AuM | $355.82 M | $226.66 M |
| Management Fees | 0.12% | 0.16% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.14% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.21% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XSPC | +1.59% | +7.40% | +12.51% | +21.45% | - |
CUSM.B | +1.39% | +11.20% | +16.46% | +26.01% | +86.16% | |
| Flows | XSPC | +$4 M | -$68 M | -$45 M | +$65 M | - |
CUSM.B | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$28 M | +$55 M | +$65 M |
XSPC vs CUSM.B exposure
Countries
XSPC
USA
96.94%
CUSM.B
USA
96.85%
Sectors
XSPC
Technology
36.67%
Finance
15.71%
Healthcare
10.35%
Industrials
9.47%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.05%
Other
18.75%
CUSM.B
Technology
42.92%
Finance
13.51%
Healthcare
9.13%
Industrials
8.74%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.60%
Other
17.10%
As of August 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XSPC
Broadcom Inc.
2.92%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.88%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.87%
Apple, Inc.
2.85%
Microsoft Corp.
2.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.41%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.29%
Tesla, Inc.
2.19%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.76%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.75%
CUSM.B
NVIDIA Corp.
6.56%
Apple, Inc.
5.81%
Microsoft Corp.
3.89%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.32%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.56%
Broadcom Inc.
2.49%
Tesla, Inc.
1.98%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.86%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.77%
Diversification
XSPC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
24.62%
CUSM.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,002 total
33.23%
Characteristics
Compare
XSPC
CUSM.B
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD Hedged | Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.14% | 0.69% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 9, 2024 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XSPC and CUSM.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XSPC or CUSM.B?
As of August 4, 2026, XSPC has returned 12.51% year to date, while CUSM.B has returned 16.46%. CUSM.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XSPC or CUSM.B?
As of August 4, 2026, XSPC manages $355.82 M in assets, while CUSM.B manages $226.66 M. XSPC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XSPC and CUSM.B managed?
XSPC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD Hedged benchmark. CUSM.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XSPC and CUSM.B emphasize?
XSPC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. CUSM.B is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XSPC or CUSM.B?
Year to date, XSPC has seen -$45.35 M in net flows, compared with +$28.49 M for CUSM.B. CUSM.B has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XSPC and CUSM.B compare?
XSPC has an expense ratio of 0.14%, while CUSM.B has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of XSPC and CUSM.B?
XSPC's largest holdings include Broadcom Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc.. CUSM.B's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XSPC or CUSM.B?
XSPC holds 496 securities, while CUSM.B holds 990. On holdings count, CUSM.B is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.