VS
Compare iShares ESG MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS) vs CI U.S. 1000 Index ETF (CUSM.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XSUS and CUSM.B provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XSUS features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.16% for CUSM.B. Performance-wise, XSUS has returned 13.95% year-to-date with +$48 M in net flows, whereas CUSM.B is at 13.38% with +$32 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XSUS
CUSM.B
| AuM | $726.28 M | $224.38 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.16% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.23% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.08% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XSUS | -1.47% | +2.66% | +13.95% | +17.53% | +77.43% |
CUSM.B | -1.98% | +0.32% | +13.38% | +16.77% | +78.35% | |
| Flows | XSUS | -$6 M | -$3 M | +$48 M | +$43 M | +$66 M |
CUSM.B | +$4 M | -$5 M | +$32 M | +$55 M | +$62 M |
XSUS vs CUSM.B exposure
Countries
XSUS
USA
96.92%
CUSM.B
USA
95.88%
Sectors
XSUS
Technology
44.82%
Finance
14.23%
Healthcare
9.75%
Industrials
8.14%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.85%
Other
15.21%
CUSM.B
Technology
42.23%
Finance
14.34%
Healthcare
9.30%
Industrials
8.80%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.63%
Other
16.70%
As of September 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XSUS
Apple, Inc.
7.50%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.02%
Microsoft Corp.
4.97%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.48%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.37%
Broadcom Inc.
2.73%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.72%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.51%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.44%
CUSM.B
Apple, Inc.
7.00%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.67%
Microsoft Corp.
4.14%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.23%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.76%
Broadcom Inc.
2.59%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.40%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.89%
Tesla, Inc.
1.50%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.47%
Diversification
XSUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 276 total
35.79%
CUSM.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 995 total
33.65%
Characteristics
Compare
XSUS
CUSM.B
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Extended ESG focus NTR index - CAD | Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.71% | 0.71% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | March 18, 2019 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XSUS and CUSM.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XSUS or CUSM.B?
As of September 11, 2026, XSUS has returned 13.95% year to date, while CUSM.B has returned 13.38%. XSUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XSUS or CUSM.B?
As of September 11, 2026, XSUS manages $726.28 M in assets, while CUSM.B manages $224.38 M. XSUS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XSUS and CUSM.B managed?
XSUS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Extended ESG focus NTR index - CAD benchmark. CUSM.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XSUS and CUSM.B emphasize?
XSUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. CUSM.B is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XSUS or CUSM.B?
Year to date, XSUS has seen +$48.04 M in net flows, compared with +$32.21 M for CUSM.B. XSUS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XSUS and CUSM.B compare?
XSUS has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while CUSM.B has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of XSUS and CUSM.B?
XSUS's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. CUSM.B's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XSUS or CUSM.B?
XSUS holds 275 securities, while CUSM.B holds 985. On holdings count, CUSM.B is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XSUS and CUSM.B
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.