VS
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOH) and CI U.S. 1000 Index ETF (CUSM.B) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XTOH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while CUSM.B leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XTOH features a management fee (MER) of 0.07%, compared to 0.16% for CUSM.B. Performance-wise, XTOH has returned 11.4% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas CUSM.B is at 14.27% with +$27 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XTOH
CUSM.B
| AuM | $1.74 M | $220.53 M |
| Management Fees | 0.07% | 0.16% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.07% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.23% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XTOH | -1.16% | +0.46% | +11.40% | +18.00% | - |
CUSM.B | -1.88% | +1.78% | +14.27% | +20.74% | +78.27% | |
| Flows | XTOH | -$0 M | -$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | - |
CUSM.B | +$0 M | -$6 M | +$27 M | +$53 M | +$56 M |
XTOH vs CUSM.B exposure
Countries
XTOH
USA
96.29%
CUSM.B
USA
95.93%
Sectors
XTOH
Technology
41.62%
Finance
14.97%
Healthcare
9.60%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.41%
Industrials
8.32%
Other
17.08%
CUSM.B
Technology
42.28%
Finance
14.29%
Healthcare
9.30%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.63%
Industrials
8.59%
Other
16.91%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XTOH
Apple, Inc.
6.77%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.53%
Microsoft Corp.
4.63%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.19%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.70%
Broadcom Inc.
2.54%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.18%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.64%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.36%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.30%
CUSM.B
Apple, Inc.
7.00%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.67%
Microsoft Corp.
4.14%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.23%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.76%
Broadcom Inc.
2.59%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.40%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.89%
Tesla, Inc.
1.50%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.47%
Diversification
XTOH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,428 total
32.85%
CUSM.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 995 total
33.65%
Characteristics
Compare
XTOH
CUSM.B
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Total Market (CAD-Hedged) Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.92% | 0.70% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 23, 2025 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XTOH and CUSM.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XTOH or CUSM.B?
As of September 2, 2026, XTOH has returned 11.40% year to date, while CUSM.B has returned 14.27%. CUSM.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XTOH or CUSM.B?
As of September 2, 2026, XTOH manages $1.74 M in assets, while CUSM.B manages $220.53 M. CUSM.B is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XTOH and CUSM.B managed?
XTOH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Total Market (CAD-Hedged) Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. CUSM.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XTOH and CUSM.B emphasize?
XTOH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. CUSM.B is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XTOH or CUSM.B?
Year to date, XTOH has seen +$0.41 M in net flows, compared with +$26.65 M for CUSM.B. CUSM.B has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XTOH and CUSM.B compare?
XTOH has an expense ratio of 0.07%, while CUSM.B has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of XTOH and CUSM.B?
XTOH's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. CUSM.B's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XTOH or CUSM.B?
XTOH holds 2387 securities, while CUSM.B holds 983. On holdings count, XTOH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XTOH and CUSM.B
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.