XTR
iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF

Full XTR fund page
VS
VCNS
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio

Full VCNS fund page

iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF (XTR) and Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio (VCNS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XTR focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Energy, and Utilities, while VCNS leans towards Sovereign, Finance, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XTR features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.22% for VCNS. Performance-wise, XTR has returned 10.2% year-to-date with -$18 M in net flows, whereas VCNS is at 6.4% with +$213 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.0%Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3Nov 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XTR
+2.01%+1.29%+10.20%+10.77%+42.21%
VCNS
+0.39%+0.09%+6.40%+5.96%+39.16%
Flows
XTR
-$1 M-$5 M-$18 M-$16 M-$114 M
VCNS
-$0 M+$36 M+$213 M+$260 M+$386 M

XTR vs VCNS exposure

Countries

XTR
Canada
49.82%
USA
37.92%
Other
12.26%
VCNS
Canada
45.42%
USA
28.88%
Other
25.70%

Sectors

XTR
Finance
28.89%
Energy
12.73%
Utilities
8.68%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.02%
Other
42.68%
VCNS
Sovereign
24.86%
Finance
18.35%
Technology
11.79%
Municipal
10.90%
Other
34.11%
As of November 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XTR
CA46430D1042
19.79%
CA46430K1084
17.14%
CA46434Y1043
12.57%
CA46431L1132
8.42%
CA46431X1096
7.57%
CA46430W1023
6.98%
CA46433N1096
6.93%
CA46434T1057
6.55%
CA46430M1041
6.47%
CA46429Q1081
3.94%
VCNS
NVIDIA Corp.
1.34%
Apple, Inc.
1.25%
Microsoft Corp.
0.98%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.97%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
0.68%
Shopify, Inc.
0.64%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2031, CAD
0.63%
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.62%
Canada, Bonds 3% 1sep2031, CAD
0.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.52%

Diversification

XTR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 11,289 total
96.35%
VCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 33,904 total
8.24%

Characteristics

Compare
XTR
VCNS
ProvideriSharesVanguard
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method--
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity, Fixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.85%2.53%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateDecember 19, 2005February 1, 2018

Frequently asked questions about XTR and VCNS

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XTR or VCNS?
As of November 11, 2026, XTR has returned 10.20% year to date, while VCNS has returned 6.40%. XTR is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XTR or VCNS?
As of November 11, 2026, XTR manages $371.86 M in assets, while VCNS manages $984.30 M. VCNS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XTR and VCNS managed?
XTR is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. VCNS is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is more diversified: XTR or VCNS?
XTR holds 1 securities, while VCNS holds 28079. On holdings count, VCNS is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XTR or VCNS?
Year to date, XTR has seen -$18.19 M in net flows, compared with +$213.14 M for VCNS. VCNS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XTR and VCNS compare?
XTR has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while VCNS has an expense ratio of 0.25%.
What sectors do XTR and VCNS emphasize?
XTR is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Utilities. VCNS is most exposed to Sovereign, Finance, and Technology.

Recent articles about XTR and VCNS

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds