XTR
iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF

Full XTR fund page
VS
XCNS
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF

Full XCNS fund page

iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF (XTR) and iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF (XCNS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XTR focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Energy, and Utilities, while XCNS leans towards Finance, Sovereign, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XTR features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.18% for XCNS. Performance-wise, XTR has returned 10.2% year-to-date with -$18 M in net flows, whereas XCNS is at 6.88% with +$126 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.0%Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3Nov 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XTR
+2.01%+1.29%+10.20%+10.77%+42.21%
XCNS
+0.35%+0.22%+6.88%+6.47%+39.31%
Flows
XTR
-$1 M-$5 M-$18 M-$16 M-$114 M
XCNS
+$12 M+$34 M+$126 M+$152 M+$214 M

XTR vs XCNS exposure

Countries

XTR
Canada
49.82%
USA
37.92%
Other
12.26%
XCNS
Canada
53.90%
USA
30.55%
Other
15.55%

Sectors

XTR
Finance
28.89%
Energy
12.73%
Utilities
8.68%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.02%
Other
42.68%
XCNS
Finance
23.05%
Sovereign
18.42%
Technology
11.68%
Municipal
10.65%
Other
36.20%
As of November 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XTR
CA46430D1042
19.79%
CA46430K1084
17.14%
CA46434Y1043
12.57%
CA46431L1132
8.42%
CA46431X1096
7.57%
CA46430W1023
6.98%
CA46433N1096
6.93%
CA46434T1057
6.55%
CA46430M1041
6.47%
CA46429Q1081
3.94%
XCNS
CA46430T1093
37.55%
US4642871507
18.97%
CA46434T1057
9.98%
CA46430J1012
9.78%
CA46431X1096
9.74%
US46429B2676
6.04%
US4642886208
5.77%
CA46434U1021
1.98%

Diversification

XTR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 11,289 total
96.35%
XCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21,951 total
99.80%

Characteristics

Compare
XTR
XCNS
ProvideriSharesiShares
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method--
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity, Fixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.85%2.65%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateDecember 19, 2005August 7, 2019

Frequently asked questions about XTR and XCNS

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XTR or XCNS?
As of November 11, 2026, XTR has returned 10.20% year to date, while XCNS has returned 6.88%. XTR is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XTR or XCNS?
As of November 11, 2026, XTR manages $371.86 M in assets, while XCNS manages $457.27 M. XCNS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XTR and XCNS managed?
XTR is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. XCNS is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is more diversified: XTR or XCNS?
XTR holds 1 securities, while XCNS holds 1. On holdings count, XTR is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XTR or XCNS?
Year to date, XTR has seen -$18.19 M in net flows, compared with +$126.42 M for XCNS. XCNS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XTR and XCNS compare?
XTR has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while XCNS has an expense ratio of 0.18%.
What sectors do XTR and XCNS emphasize?
XTR is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Utilities. XCNS is most exposed to Finance, Sovereign, and Technology.

Recent articles about XTR and XCNS

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds