VS
Compare iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (XUSC) vs CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XUSC provides Technology, Finance, and Healthcare exposures, while DGR.B is primarily weighted in Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XUSC features a management fee (MER) of 0.12%, compared to 0.35% for DGR.B. Performance-wise, XUSC has returned 13.9% year-to-date with +$45 M in net flows, whereas DGR.B is at 12.3% with -$16 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XUSC
DGR.B
| AuM | $286.45 M | $495.82 M |
| Management Fees | 0.12% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.13% | 0.38% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.09% | -0.49% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XUSC | -2.49% | +1.13% | +13.90% | +20.37% | - |
DGR.B | -1.69% | +1.46% | +12.30% | +15.43% | +56.39% | |
| Flows | XUSC | +$7 M | +$20 M | +$45 M | +$60 M | - |
DGR.B | -$7 M | -$13 M | -$16 M | -$10 M | +$207 M |
XUSC vs DGR.B exposure
Countries
XUSC
USA
95.55%
DGR.B
USA
98.08%
Sectors
XUSC
Technology
34.78%
Finance
16.90%
Healthcare
10.83%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.34%
Industrials
9.14%
Other
19.00%
DGR.B
Technology
39.10%
Healthcare
13.08%
Industrials
10.42%
Finance
7.79%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.28%
Other
22.33%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XUSC
Apple, Inc.
3.35%
Microsoft Corp.
3.33%
Broadcom Inc.
3.05%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.90%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.85%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.23%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.86%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.77%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.76%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.72%
DGR.B
NVIDIA Corp.
7.72%
Microsoft Corp.
6.93%
Apple, Inc.
4.44%
The Coca-Cola Co.
3.13%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.95%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.83%
The Home Depot, Inc.
2.64%
Broadcom Inc.
2.40%
Johnson & Johnson
2.35%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.18%
Diversification
XUSC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
24.82%
DGR.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 197 total
37.57%
Characteristics
Compare
XUSC
DGR.B
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.94% | 1.10% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 9, 2024 | July 12, 2016 |
Frequently asked questions about XUSC and DGR.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUSC or DGR.B?
As of September 2, 2026, XUSC has returned 13.90% year to date, while DGR.B has returned 12.30%. XUSC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUSC or DGR.B?
As of September 2, 2026, XUSC manages $286.45 M in assets, while DGR.B manages $495.82 M. DGR.B is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUSC and DGR.B managed?
XUSC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD benchmark. DGR.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XUSC and DGR.B emphasize?
XUSC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. DGR.B is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUSC or DGR.B?
Year to date, XUSC has seen +$44.79 M in net flows, compared with -$16.01 M for DGR.B. XUSC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUSC and DGR.B compare?
XUSC has an expense ratio of 0.13%, while DGR.B has an expense ratio of 0.38%.
What are the top holdings of XUSC and DGR.B?
XUSC's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Broadcom Inc.. DGR.B's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XUSC or DGR.B?
XUSC holds 495 securities, while DGR.B holds 196. On holdings count, XUSC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XUSC and DGR.B
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.