VS
Compare iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (XUSC) vs CI S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XUSC and ESG provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XUSC features a management fee (MER) of 0.12%, compared to 0.15% for ESG. Performance-wise, XUSC has returned 14.47% year-to-date with +$46 M in net flows, whereas ESG is at 15.23% with +$490 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XUSC
ESG
| AuM | $289.30 M | $1,112.47 M |
| Management Fees | 0.12% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.13% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.09% | -0.07% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XUSC | -1.99% | +1.69% | +14.47% | +20.64% | - |
ESG | -1.43% | +3.81% | +15.23% | +23.61% | +79.46% | |
| Flows | XUSC | +$9 M | +$20 M | +$46 M | +$59 M | - |
ESG | +$6 M | +$19 M | +$490 M | +$439 M | +$650 M |
XUSC vs ESG exposure
Countries
XUSC
USA
95.55%
ESG
USA
96.59%
Sectors
XUSC
Technology
34.78%
Finance
16.90%
Healthcare
10.83%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.34%
Industrials
9.14%
Other
19.00%
ESG
Technology
46.01%
Finance
15.14%
Healthcare
11.20%
Industrials
8.36%
Other
19.29%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XUSC
Apple, Inc.
3.35%
Microsoft Corp.
3.33%
Broadcom Inc.
3.05%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.90%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.85%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.23%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.86%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.77%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.76%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.72%
ESG
NVIDIA Corp.
12.24%
Microsoft Corp.
8.69%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.24%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.34%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.29%
Visa, Inc.
1.53%
Walmart, Inc.
1.23%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.16%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.15%
Diversification
XUSC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
24.82%
ESG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 328 total
40.14%
Characteristics
Compare
XUSC
ESG
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD | S&P 500 Scored & Screened NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.93% | 0.74% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | July 9, 2024 | March 5, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about XUSC and ESG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUSC or ESG?
As of September 3, 2026, XUSC has returned 14.47% year to date, while ESG has returned 15.23%. ESG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUSC or ESG?
As of September 3, 2026, XUSC manages $289.30 M in assets, while ESG manages $1.11 B. ESG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUSC and ESG managed?
XUSC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD benchmark. ESG is passively managed by CI. It tracks the S&P 500 Scored & Screened NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XUSC and ESG emphasize?
XUSC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. ESG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUSC or ESG?
Year to date, XUSC has seen +$46.20 M in net flows, compared with +$489.79 M for ESG. ESG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUSC and ESG compare?
XUSC has an expense ratio of 0.13%, while ESG has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of XUSC and ESG?
XUSC's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Broadcom Inc.. ESG's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XUSC or ESG?
XUSC holds 495 securities, while ESG holds 325. On holdings count, XUSC is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.