VS
Compare iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (XUSC) vs CI S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XUSC and ESG.F provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XUSC features a management fee (MER) of 0.12%, compared to 0.15% for ESG.F. Performance-wise, XUSC has returned 16.01% year-to-date with +$56 M in net flows, whereas ESG.F is at 10.61% with -$16 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XUSC
ESG.F
| AuM | $303.20 M | $104.02 M |
| Management Fees | 0.12% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.13% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.08% | -0.12% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XUSC | +2.78% | +1.97% | +16.01% | +16.82% | - |
ESG.F | +1.48% | +1.87% | +10.61% | +15.74% | +70.54% | |
| Flows | XUSC | +$9 M | +$23 M | +$56 M | +$86 M | - |
ESG.F | -$2 M | -$2 M | -$16 M | -$9 M | +$26 M |
XUSC vs ESG.F exposure
Countries
XUSC
USA
96.99%
ESG.F
USA
96.26%
Sectors
XUSC
Technology
35.25%
Finance
16.50%
Healthcare
11.00%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.21%
Industrials
9.02%
Other
19.01%
ESG.F
Technology
46.86%
Finance
14.79%
Healthcare
11.40%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
19.09%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XUSC
Microsoft Corp.
3.63%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.13%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.10%
Apple, Inc.
3.09%
Broadcom Inc.
2.83%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.30%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.98%
Tesla, Inc.
1.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.75%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.69%
ESG.F
NVIDIA Corp.
13.05%
Microsoft Corp.
9.21%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.85%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.87%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.64%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.24%
Visa, Inc.
1.54%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.16%
Walmart, Inc.
1.12%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.11%
Diversification
XUSC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
25.39%
ESG.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 326 total
40.77%
Characteristics
Compare
XUSC
ESG.F
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD | S&P 500 Scored & Screened CAD Hedged NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.92% | 0.81% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | July 9, 2024 | February 14, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about XUSC and ESG.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUSC or ESG.F?
As of October 16, 2026, XUSC has returned 16.01% year to date, while ESG.F has returned 10.61%. XUSC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUSC or ESG.F?
As of October 16, 2026, XUSC manages $303.20 M in assets, while ESG.F manages $104.02 M. XUSC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUSC and ESG.F managed?
XUSC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD benchmark. ESG.F is passively managed by CI. It tracks the S&P 500 Scored & Screened CAD Hedged NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XUSC and ESG.F emphasize?
XUSC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. ESG.F is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUSC or ESG.F?
Year to date, XUSC has seen +$56.26 M in net flows, compared with -$16.25 M for ESG.F. XUSC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUSC and ESG.F compare?
XUSC has an expense ratio of 0.13%, while ESG.F has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of XUSC and ESG.F?
XUSC's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., NVIDIA Corp., and Amazon.com, Inc.. ESG.F's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XUSC or ESG.F?
XUSC holds 500 securities, while ESG.F holds 323. On holdings count, XUSC is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.