XUSC
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF

Full XUSC fund page
VS
MULC
Manulife Multifactor U.S. Large Cap Index ETF

Full MULC fund page

Compare iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (XUSC) vs Manulife Multifactor U.S. Large Cap Index ETF (MULC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XUSC provides Technology, Finance, and Healthcare exposures, while MULC is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XUSC features a management fee (MER) of 0.12%, compared to 0.37% for MULC. Performance-wise, XUSC has returned 16.01% year-to-date with +$56 M in net flows, whereas MULC is at 11.81% with +$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XUSC
+2.78%+1.97%+16.01%+16.82%-
MULC
+1.25%+0.35%+11.81%+14.95%+64.24%
Flows
XUSC
+$9 M+$23 M+$56 M+$86 M-
MULC
-$0 M+$0 M+$6 M+$3 M+$1 M

XUSC vs MULC exposure

Countries

XUSC
USA
96.99%
MULC
USA
96.39%

Sectors

XUSC
Technology
35.25%
Finance
16.50%
Healthcare
11.00%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.21%
Industrials
9.02%
Other
19.01%
MULC
Technology
34.13%
Finance
16.60%
Industrials
10.19%
Healthcare
9.72%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.70%
Other
20.66%
As of October 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XUSC
Microsoft Corp.
3.63%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.13%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.10%
Apple, Inc.
3.09%
Broadcom Inc.
2.83%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.30%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.98%
Tesla, Inc.
1.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.75%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.69%
MULC
NVIDIA Corp.
4.38%
Apple, Inc.
4.31%
Microsoft Corp.
3.37%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.94%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.49%
Broadcom Inc.
1.70%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.57%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.33%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.21%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.03%

Diversification

XUSC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
25.39%
MULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 764 total
24.34%

Characteristics

Compare
XUSC
MULC
ProvideriSharesManulife Investments
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CADJohn Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Total Return Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.92%0.80%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJuly 9, 2024March 23, 2017

Frequently asked questions about XUSC and MULC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUSC or MULC?
As of October 16, 2026, XUSC has returned 16.01% year to date, while MULC has returned 11.81%. XUSC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUSC or MULC?
As of October 16, 2026, XUSC manages $303.20 M in assets, while MULC manages $16.27 M. XUSC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUSC and MULC managed?
XUSC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD benchmark. MULC is passively managed by Manulife Investments. It tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XUSC and MULC emphasize?
XUSC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. MULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUSC or MULC?
Year to date, XUSC has seen +$56.26 M in net flows, compared with +$5.83 M for MULC. XUSC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUSC and MULC compare?
XUSC has an expense ratio of 0.13%, while MULC has an expense ratio of 0.42%.
What are the top holdings of XUSC and MULC?
XUSC's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., NVIDIA Corp., and Amazon.com, Inc.. MULC's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XUSC or MULC?
XUSC holds 500 securities, while MULC holds 756. On holdings count, MULC is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds