VS
Compare iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (XUSC) vs iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (XSPC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XUSC and XSPC provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XUSC features a management fee (MER) of 0.12%, compared to 0.12% for XSPC. Performance-wise, XUSC has returned 14.47% year-to-date with +$46 M in net flows, whereas XSPC is at 12.22% with -$45 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XUSC
XSPC
| AuM | $289.30 M | $354.91 M |
| Management Fees | 0.12% | 0.12% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.13% | 0.14% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.09% | 0.16% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XUSC | -1.99% | +1.69% | +14.47% | +20.64% | - |
XSPC | -0.25% | +1.95% | +12.22% | +18.40% | - | |
| Flows | XUSC | +$9 M | +$20 M | +$46 M | +$59 M | - |
XSPC | +$1 M | +$2 M | -$45 M | +$55 M | - |
XUSC vs XSPC exposure
Countries
XUSC
USA
95.55%
XSPC
USA
95.55%
Sectors
XUSC
Technology
34.78%
Finance
16.90%
Healthcare
10.83%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.34%
Industrials
9.14%
Other
19.00%
XSPC
Technology
34.78%
Finance
16.90%
Healthcare
10.83%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.34%
Industrials
9.14%
Other
19.00%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XUSC
Apple, Inc.
3.35%
Microsoft Corp.
3.33%
Broadcom Inc.
3.05%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.90%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.85%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.23%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.86%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.77%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.76%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.72%
XSPC
Apple, Inc.
3.35%
Microsoft Corp.
3.33%
Broadcom Inc.
3.05%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.90%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.85%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.23%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.86%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.77%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.76%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.72%
Diversification
XUSC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
24.82%
XSPC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
24.82%
Characteristics
Compare
XUSC
XSPC
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD | S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD Hedged |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.93% | 1.14% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 9, 2024 | July 9, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about XUSC and XSPC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUSC or XSPC?
As of September 3, 2026, XUSC has returned 14.47% year to date, while XSPC has returned 12.22%. XUSC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUSC or XSPC?
As of September 3, 2026, XUSC manages $289.30 M in assets, while XSPC manages $354.91 M. XSPC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUSC and XSPC managed?
XUSC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD benchmark. XSPC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD Hedged benchmark.
What sectors do XUSC and XSPC emphasize?
XUSC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. XSPC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUSC or XSPC?
Year to date, XUSC has seen +$46.20 M in net flows, compared with -$45.34 M for XSPC. XUSC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUSC and XSPC compare?
XUSC has an expense ratio of 0.13%, while XSPC has an expense ratio of 0.14%.
What are the top holdings of XUSC and XSPC?
XUSC's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Broadcom Inc.. XSPC's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XUSC or XSPC?
XUSC holds 495 securities, while XSPC holds 495. On holdings count, XUSC is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.