VS
Compare iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD) vs CI Global Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (CGQD.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XWD provides Technology, Finance, and Industrials exposures, while CGQD.B is primarily weighted in Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XWD features a management fee (MER) of 0.44%, compared to 0.45% for CGQD.B. Performance-wise, XWD has returned 12.75% year-to-date with +$70 M in net flows, whereas CGQD.B is at 11.02% with +$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XWD
CGQD.B
| AuM | $1,731.26 M | $48.66 M |
| Management Fees | 0.44% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.48% | 0.47% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XWD | -2.32% | +0.42% | +12.75% | +11.95% | +82.62% |
CGQD.B | -1.00% | +0.71% | +11.02% | +10.65% | - | |
| Flows | XWD | -$31 M | +$12 M | +$70 M | +$108 M | +$275 M |
CGQD.B | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$8 M | +$13 M | - |
XWD vs CGQD.B exposure
Countries
XWD
USA
70.81%
Other
29.19%
CGQD.B
USA
72.60%
Other
27.40%
Sectors
XWD
Technology
37.90%
Finance
17.39%
Industrials
9.26%
Healthcare
8.88%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.22%
Other
18.35%
CGQD.B
Technology
34.01%
Industrials
12.67%
Healthcare
11.45%
Finance
10.15%
Other
31.72%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XWD
US4642872000
72.45%
US4642874659
23.99%
CA46428D1087
3.40%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
0.10%
CGQD.B
CA12559L1031
72.48%
CA17165X2014
23.66%
CA17165G1090
3.51%
Diversification
XWD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,222 total
99.94%
CGQD.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 546 total
99.65%
Characteristics
Compare
XWD
CGQD.B
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Daily Total Return Net Index - USD | WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.20% | 0.63% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 18, 2009 | September 6, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about XWD and CGQD.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XWD or CGQD.B?
As of October 30, 2026, XWD has returned 12.75% year to date, while CGQD.B has returned 11.02%. XWD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XWD or CGQD.B?
As of October 30, 2026, XWD manages $1.73 B in assets, while CGQD.B manages $48.66 M. XWD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XWD and CGQD.B managed?
XWD is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI World Daily Total Return Net Index - USD benchmark. CGQD.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XWD or CGQD.B?
XWD holds 2 securities, while CGQD.B holds 1. On holdings count, XWD is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XWD or CGQD.B?
Year to date, XWD has seen +$69.91 M in net flows, compared with +$8.48 M for CGQD.B. XWD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XWD and CGQD.B compare?
XWD has an expense ratio of 0.48%, while CGQD.B has an expense ratio of 0.47%.
What sectors do XWD and CGQD.B emphasize?
XWD is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. CGQD.B is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare.
Recent articles about XWD and CGQD.B
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.