VS
Compare iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD) vs BMO MSCI World ESG Leaders Index ETF (ESGG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XWD provides Technology, Finance, and Industrials exposures, while ESGG is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XWD features a management fee (MER) of 0.44%, compared to 0.25% for ESGG. Performance-wise, XWD has returned 14.61% year-to-date with +$95 M in net flows, whereas ESGG is at 14.64% with -$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XWD
ESGG
| AuM | $1,784.73 M | $59.07 M |
| Management Fees | 0.44% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.48% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.24% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XWD | -1.28% | +2.22% | +14.61% | +20.19% | +75.17% |
ESGG | -1.11% | +2.92% | +14.64% | +21.94% | +74.70% | |
| Flows | XWD | +$31 M | +$61 M | +$95 M | +$155 M | +$314 M |
ESGG | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M | +$3 M | +$9 M |
XWD vs ESGG exposure
Countries
XWD
USA
69.85%
Other
30.15%
ESGG
USA
69.95%
Other
30.05%
Sectors
XWD
Technology
35.11%
Finance
18.67%
Industrials
9.80%
Healthcare
8.91%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.58%
Other
18.93%
ESGG
Technology
36.78%
Finance
18.12%
Healthcare
10.13%
Industrials
9.52%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.06%
Other
18.39%
As of September 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XWD
Apple, Inc.
5.46%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.27%
Microsoft Corp.
3.74%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.57%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.18%
Broadcom Inc.
2.05%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.76%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.32%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.10%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.05%
ESGG
NVIDIA Corp.
9.74%
Microsoft Corp.
6.89%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.34%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.01%
Tesla, Inc.
1.88%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.71%
ASML Holding NV
1.35%
Johnson & Johnson
1.33%
Visa, Inc.
1.33%
Diversification
XWD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,238 total
26.51%
ESGG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 654 total
33.80%
Characteristics
Compare
XWD
ESGG
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Daily Total Return Net Index - USD | MSCI World Selection NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.18% | 0.85% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | June 18, 2009 | January 27, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about XWD and ESGG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XWD or ESGG?
As of September 4, 2026, XWD has returned 14.61% year to date, while ESGG has returned 14.64%. ESGG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XWD or ESGG?
As of September 4, 2026, XWD manages $1.78 B in assets, while ESGG manages $59.07 M. XWD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XWD and ESGG managed?
XWD is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI World Daily Total Return Net Index - USD benchmark. ESGG is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI World Selection NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XWD and ESGG emphasize?
XWD is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. ESGG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XWD or ESGG?
Year to date, XWD has seen +$94.50 M in net flows, compared with -$0.07 M for ESGG. XWD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XWD and ESGG compare?
XWD has an expense ratio of 0.48%, while ESGG has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XWD and ESGG?
XWD's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. ESGG's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XWD or ESGG?
XWD holds 1227 securities, while ESGG holds 649. On holdings count, XWD is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XWD and ESGG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.