XWD
iShares MSCI World Index ETF

Full XWD fund page
VS
QEF
AGF Systematic Global ESG Factors ETF

Full QEF fund page

iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD) and AGF Systematic Global ESG Factors ETF (QEF) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XWD focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Industrials, while QEF leans towards Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XWD features a management fee (MER) of 0.44%, compared to 0.45% for QEF. Performance-wise, XWD has returned 12.75% year-to-date with +$70 M in net flows, whereas QEF is at 11.06% with -$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15Oct 22Oct 29

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 29, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XWD
-2.32%+0.42%+12.75%+11.95%+82.62%
QEF
-2.41%+1.95%+11.06%+10.00%+69.93%
Flows
XWD
-$31 M+$12 M+$70 M+$108 M+$275 M
QEF
-$0 M-$1 M-$7 M-$10 M-$44 M

XWD vs QEF exposure

Countries

XWD
USA
70.81%
Other
29.19%
QEF
USA
60.11%
Other
39.89%

Sectors

XWD
Technology
37.90%
Finance
17.39%
Industrials
9.26%
Healthcare
8.88%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.22%
Other
18.35%
QEF
Technology
38.85%
Finance
21.39%
Industrials
8.02%
Healthcare
7.90%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.25%
Other
16.58%
As of October 29, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XWD
US4642872000
72.45%
US4642874659
23.99%
CA46428D1087
3.40%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
0.10%
QEF
NVIDIA Corp.
6.19%
Apple, Inc.
5.01%
Microsoft Corp.
4.11%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.68%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.49%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.37%
Broadcom Inc.
2.00%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.57%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.37%

Diversification

XWD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,222 total
99.94%
QEF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 132 total
29.20%

Characteristics

Compare
XWD
QEF
ProvideriSharesAGF
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkMSCI World Daily Total Return Net Index - USD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)-
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.20%1.16%
Meets ESG criteriaNoYes
Inception DateJune 18, 2009February 12, 2018

Frequently asked questions about XWD and QEF

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XWD or QEF?
As of October 29, 2026, XWD has returned 12.75% year to date, while QEF has returned 11.06%. XWD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XWD or QEF?
As of October 29, 2026, XWD manages $1.73 B in assets, while QEF manages $112.58 M. XWD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XWD and QEF managed?
XWD is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI World Daily Total Return Net Index - USD benchmark. QEF is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XWD and QEF emphasize?
XWD is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. QEF is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XWD or QEF?
Year to date, XWD has seen +$69.91 M in net flows, compared with -$7.14 M for QEF. XWD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XWD and QEF compare?
XWD has an expense ratio of 0.48%, while QEF has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of XWD and QEF?
XWD's largest holdings include Space Exploration Technologies Corp.. QEF's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XWD or QEF?
XWD holds 2 securities, while QEF holds 130. On holdings count, QEF is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XWD and QEF

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds