VS
When evaluating costs, YAMZ features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, YAMZ has returned 1.66% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 20.18% with -$66 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
YAMZ
ZUT
| AuM | $101.75 M | $901.76 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.72% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.90% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | YAMZ | -11.95% | +10.05% | -1.66% | +5.32% | +117.96% |
ZUT | +3.71% | +8.83% | +20.18% | +27.67% | +47.40% | |
| Flows | YAMZ | +$1 M | -$10 M | -$3 M | +$17 M | +$77 M |
ZUT | -$4 M | +$15 M | -$66 M | +$132 M | +$243 M |
YAMZ vs ZUT exposure
Countries
YAMZ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
85.23%
Bermuda
14.77%
Sectors
YAMZ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
YAMZ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
BORALEX
10.04%
NORTHLAND POWER
8.09%
ALTAGAS
8.08%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.87%
ATCO
7.62%
CAPITAL POWER
7.57%
EMERA
7.48%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.47%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.43%
FORTIS
7.23%
Diversification
YAMZ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.87%
Characteristics
Compare
YAMZ
ZUT
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 10.59% | 2.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 14, 2022 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about YAMZ and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: YAMZ or ZUT?
As of June 12, 2026, YAMZ has returned -1.66% year to date, while ZUT has returned 20.18%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: YAMZ or ZUT?
As of June 12, 2026, YAMZ manages $101.75 M in assets, while ZUT manages $901.76 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are YAMZ and ZUT managed?
YAMZ is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: YAMZ or ZUT?
Year to date, YAMZ has seen -$3.35 M in net flows, compared with -$65.77 M for ZUT. YAMZ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of YAMZ and ZUT compare?
YAMZ has an expense ratio of 1.72%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about YAMZ and ZUT
Yield-focused ETFs and the Benefit They Can Provide Investors
ETFs that employ covered call-writing strategies can be effective ways to generate monthly yield for investors while still providing exposure to a security or asset class on a long-term basis.
Posted on 6/13/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.