YCST
Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF

Full YCST fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

When evaluating costs, YCST features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, YCST has returned 9.58% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 32.72% with -$462 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.06.0%Jun 22Jun 29Jul 7Jul 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
YCST
-1.32%-6.33%+9.58%-1.12%-
HBNK
+1.99%+16.52%+32.72%+67.44%+149.42%
Flows
YCST
+$1 M+$1 M+$1 M+$6 M-
HBNK
-$33 M+$8 M-$462 M-$768 M-$7 M

YCST vs HBNK exposure

Countries

YCST
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

YCST
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
100.00%
As of July 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

YCST
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%

Diversification

YCST
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
YCST
HBNK
ProviderPurpose InvestmentsGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield13.44%2.54%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 20, 2025July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about YCST and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: YCST or HBNK?
As of July 20, 2026, YCST has returned 9.58% year to date, while HBNK has returned 32.72%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: YCST or HBNK?
As of July 20, 2026, YCST manages $8.73 M in assets, while HBNK manages $787.51 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are YCST and HBNK managed?
YCST is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: YCST or HBNK?
Year to date, YCST has seen +$1.34 M in net flows, compared with -$462.37 M for HBNK. YCST has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of YCST and HBNK compare?
YCST has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.

Recent articles about YCST and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds