VS
When evaluating costs, ZAAA features a management fee (MER) of 0.23%, compared to 0.4% for HHIS. Performance-wise, ZAAA has returned 5.35% year-to-date with +$27 M in net flows, whereas HHIS is at 14.77% with +$887 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZAAA
HHIS
| AuM | $76.16 M | $2,036.61 M |
| Management Fees | 0.23% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.23% | 1.88% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 18, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZAAA | +1.18% | +0.21% | +5.35% | +6.29% | - |
HHIS | +7.32% | +6.94% | +14.77% | +14.43% | - | |
| Flows | ZAAA | +$8 M | +$12 M | +$27 M | +$39 M | - |
HHIS | +$89 M | +$274 M | +$887 M | +$1,281 M | - |
ZAAA vs HHIS exposure
Countries
ZAAA
Other
78.98%
USA
21.01%
HHIS
Other
100.00%
Sectors
ZAAA
Other
78.99%
Industrials
20.90%
HHIS
Other
100.00%
As of September 18, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZAAA
US671026AW26
3.69%
US92920DAL91
3.32%
Magnetite CLO, 2026-55A, FRN 15apr2039, USD (ABS, A1)
3.32%
AIMCO CLO 2026-27A, FRN 20apr2039, USD (ABS, A1)
2.86%
Diameter Capital CLO 2022-4A, FRN 18jan2039, USD (ABS, ARR)
1.94%
AIMCO CLO 2025-23A, FRN 20apr2038, USD (ABS, A)
1.94%
CIFC Funding 2023-3A, FRN 20jan2039, USD (ABS, A1R)
1.85%
US720916AA38
1.85%
US03990NAA37
1.85%
US76676AAA88
1.66%
HHIS
CA41751Y1007
8.00%
CA41751W1041
7.99%
CA41753X1006
7.57%
CA41754L1058
7.53%
CA41757J1075
7.23%
CA41751X1024
7.19%
CA41754U1057
6.99%
CA4175171095
6.67%
CA4179141086
5.56%
CA4175521067
4.81%
Diversification
ZAAA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,412 total
24.28%
HHIS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
69.55%
Characteristics
Compare
ZAAA
HHIS
| Provider | BMO | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.08% | 27.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 30, 2025 | January 16, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZAAA and HHIS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZAAA or HHIS?
As of September 18, 2026, ZAAA has returned 5.35% year to date, while HHIS has returned 14.77%. HHIS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZAAA or HHIS?
As of September 18, 2026, ZAAA manages $76.16 M in assets, while HHIS manages $2.04 B. HHIS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZAAA and HHIS managed?
ZAAA is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. HHIS is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZAAA or HHIS?
Year to date, ZAAA has seen +$27.17 M in net flows, compared with +$886.89 M for HHIS. HHIS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZAAA and HHIS compare?
ZAAA has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while HHIS has an expense ratio of 1.88%.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZAAA or HHIS?
ZAAA holds 153 securities, while HHIS holds 1. On holdings count, ZAAA is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZAAA and HHIS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.