ZBBZ
BMO BBB CLO ETF

Full ZBBZ fund page
VS
RCLO
RBC AAA CLO (CAD Hedged) ETF

Full RCLO fund page

BMO BBB CLO ETF (ZBBZ) and RBC AAA CLO (CAD Hedged) ETF (RCLO) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZBBZ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials, Finance, and Non-Corporate, while RCLO leans towards Finance and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZBBZ features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.39% for RCLO. Performance-wise, ZBBZ has returned 3.86% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas RCLO is at 2.52% with +$19 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 4, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZBBZ
-1.12%+0.98%+3.86%--
RCLO
+0.37%+0.97%+2.52%+3.56%-
Flows
ZBBZ
-$3 M+$0 M-$4 M--
RCLO
+$2 M+$3 M+$19 M+$36 M-

ZBBZ vs RCLO exposure

Countries

ZBBZ
Other
81.21%
USA
17.90%
RCLO
Other
91.15%
Other
8.85%

Sectors

ZBBZ
Other
81.21%
Industrials
17.85%
RCLO
Other
91.15%
Other
8.85%
As of September 4, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZBBZ
US74984FAG63
6.06%
US81752T5285
3.54%
US67403CAY12
3.43%
US76857JAJ16
3.43%
US871972AZ80
3.42%
RAD CLO 2024-24A, FRN 30jul2040, USD (21-12A, ABS, C2R)
2.55%
US55954PBA12
2.54%
US149931AL12
2.53%
US403967AA05
2.52%
CIFC Funding 2025-1A, FRN 15apr2038, USD (25-2A, ABS, D2)
2.49%
RCLO
USG6463GAL89
6.56%
USG7089UAM74
5.79%
Ares Euro CLO XVIII, FRN 17apr2039, EUR (ABS, ARR)
5.66%
USG5279JAF15
4.43%
USG3038PAU15
4.11%
USG72014AL00
4.10%
USG37939AA65
4.10%
USG6000NAF62
4.10%
USG6S34PAJ38
3.78%
USG7310CAL03
3.69%

Diversification

ZBBZ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 917 total
32.52%
RCLO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 24 total
46.32%

Characteristics

Compare
ZBBZ
RCLO
ProviderBMORBC Global Asset Management
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassFixed IncomeFixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-5.01%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 9, 2025April 25, 2025

Frequently asked questions about ZBBZ and RCLO

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZBBZ or RCLO?
As of September 4, 2026, ZBBZ has returned 3.86% year to date, while RCLO has returned 2.52%. ZBBZ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZBBZ or RCLO?
As of September 4, 2026, ZBBZ manages $3.69 M in assets, while RCLO manages $80.69 M. RCLO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZBBZ and RCLO managed?
ZBBZ is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. RCLO is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZBBZ and RCLO emphasize?
ZBBZ is most exposed to Industrials, Finance, and Non-Corporate. RCLO is most exposed to Finance and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZBBZ or RCLO?
Year to date, ZBBZ has seen -$3.60 M in net flows, compared with +$18.78 M for RCLO. RCLO has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZBBZ and RCLO compare?
ZBBZ has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while RCLO has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
What are the top holdings of ZBBZ and RCLO?
ZBBZ's largest holdings include RAD CLO 2024-24A, FRN 30jul2040, USD (21-12A, ABS, C2R) and CIFC Funding 2025-1A, FRN 15apr2038, USD (25-2A, ABS, D2). RCLO's top holdings include Ares Euro CLO XVIII, FRN 17apr2039, EUR (ABS, ARR) and Apidos CLO 2021-37, FRN 22oct2034, USD (ABS, A).
Which ETF is more diversified: ZBBZ or RCLO?
ZBBZ holds 75 securities, while RCLO holds 3. On holdings count, ZBBZ is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZBBZ and RCLO

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds