ZBCB
BMO Canadian Core Plus US Balanced ETF

Full ZBCB fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

BMO Canadian Core Plus US Balanced ETF (ZBCB) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZBCB focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Municipal, and Information Technology, while HEWB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, ZBCB features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, ZBCB has returned 4.21% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 15.02% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0246810%Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28May 5

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 7, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZBCB
+3.13%+3.19%+4.21%--
HEWB
+9.67%+10.04%+15.02%+65.38%+121.08%
Flows
ZBCB
+$0 M+$2 M+$2 M--
HEWB
+$8 M+$9 M+$12 M+$7 M-$3 M

ZBCB vs HEWB exposure

Countries

ZBCB
Canada
60.08%
USA
37.89%
HEWB
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

ZBCB
Financials
13.73%
Municipal
13.07%
Other
11.16%
Information Technology
9.54%
Energy
7.18%
Other
45.33%
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of May 7, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZBCB
ROYAL BK CANADA
3.43%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.75%
APPLE
2.58%
BK OF AMERICA CO
2.20%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.12%
SUNCOR ENERGY
2.06%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.96%
ENBRIDGE
1.95%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.80%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.79%
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%

Diversification

ZBCB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 14,995 total
22.64%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
ZBCB
HEWB
ProviderBMOGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield-0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 21, 2025January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about ZBCB and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZBCB or HEWB?
As of May 7, 2026, ZBCB has returned 4.21% year to date, while HEWB has returned 15.02%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZBCB or HEWB?
As of May 7, 2026, ZBCB manages $8.67 M in assets, while HEWB manages $290.21 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZBCB and HEWB managed?
ZBCB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZBCB and HEWB emphasize?
ZBCB is most exposed to Financials, Municipal, and Information Technology. HEWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZBCB or HEWB?
Year to date, ZBCB has seen +$1.66 M in net flows, compared with +$12.19 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZBCB and HEWB compare?
ZBCB has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of ZBCB and HEWB?
ZBCB's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and ALPHABET INC-CL. HEWB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZBCB or HEWB?
ZBCB holds 5581 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, ZBCB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZBCB and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds