ZBDU
BMO US Dividend Growth ETF

Full ZBDU fund page
VS
ZDY
BMO US Dividend ETF

Full ZDY fund page

BMO US Dividend Growth ETF (ZBDU) and BMO US Dividend ETF (ZDY) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZBDU focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Healthcare, while ZDY leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZBDU features a management fee (MER) of 0.51%, compared to 0.3% for ZDY. Performance-wise, ZBDU has returned 12.93% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZDY is at 16.55% with +$73 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.0%Jun 17Jun 25Jul 3Jul 10Jul 17

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZBDU
+1.44%+7.67%+12.93%+20.98%-
ZDY
-1.03%+8.02%+16.55%+25.08%+70.91%
Flows
ZBDU
+$0 M+$0 M+$2 M+$5 M-
ZDY
-$12 M+$14 M+$73 M+$92 M+$134 M

ZBDU vs ZDY exposure

Countries

ZBDU
USA
97.21%
ZDY
USA
97.58%

Sectors

ZBDU
Finance
28.10%
Technology
20.92%
Healthcare
18.81%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.27%
Other
23.90%
ZDY
Technology
34.92%
Finance
14.07%
Healthcare
10.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.64%
Energy
8.31%
Other
22.98%
As of July 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZBDU
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.22%
Johnson & Johnson
3.75%
Bank of America Corp.
3.64%
Morgan Stanley
3.61%
Apple, Inc.
3.36%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
3.35%
Lockheed Martin Corp.
3.20%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
3.13%
Microsoft Corp.
3.04%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.99%
ZDY
Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.92%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
3.66%
Broadcom Inc.
3.33%
Apple, Inc.
3.32%
AbbVie, Inc.
3.07%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.97%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.91%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.88%
Microchip Technology, Inc.
2.54%
Chevron Corp.
2.42%

Diversification

ZBDU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 47 total
34.31%
ZDY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 96 total
31.00%

Characteristics

Compare
ZBDU
ZDY
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.25%1.49%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 21, 2025March 27, 2013

Frequently asked questions about ZBDU and ZDY

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZBDU or ZDY?
As of July 17, 2026, ZBDU has returned 12.93% year to date, while ZDY has returned 16.55%. ZDY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZBDU or ZDY?
As of July 17, 2026, ZBDU manages $7.46 M in assets, while ZDY manages $878.42 M. ZDY is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZBDU and ZDY managed?
ZBDU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZDY is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZBDU and ZDY emphasize?
ZBDU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. ZDY is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZBDU or ZDY?
Year to date, ZBDU has seen +$1.77 M in net flows, compared with +$73.32 M for ZDY. ZDY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZBDU and ZDY compare?
ZBDU has an expense ratio of 0.51%, while ZDY has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
What are the top holdings of ZBDU and ZDY?
ZBDU's largest holdings include Cisco Systems, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, and Bank of America Corp.. ZDY's top holdings include Cisco Systems, Inc., QUALCOMM, Inc., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZBDU or ZDY?
ZBDU holds 47 securities, while ZDY holds 96. On holdings count, ZDY is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds