VS
Compare BMO US Large Cap Disciplined Value ETF (ZBVU) vs iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU.C) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZBVU provides Finance, Technology, and Healthcare exposures, while CLU.C is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZBVU features a management fee (MER) of 0.51%, compared to 0.65% for CLU.C. Performance-wise, ZBVU has returned 19.12% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas CLU.C is at 20.54% with -$9 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZBVU
CLU.C
| AuM | $10.63 M | $102.04 M |
| Management Fees | 0.51% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.51% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.06% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZBVU | -0.67% | +0.58% | +19.12% | +21.10% | - |
CLU.C | +1.28% | +4.14% | +20.54% | +21.40% | +83.40% | |
| Flows | ZBVU | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$0 M | - |
CLU.C | +$0 M | -$5 M | -$9 M | -$9 M | -$19 M |
ZBVU vs CLU.C exposure
Countries
ZBVU
USA
94.93%
CLU.C
USA
97.35%
Sectors
ZBVU
Finance
32.43%
Technology
16.34%
Healthcare
10.46%
Industrials
9.61%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.06%
Other
24.10%
CLU.C
Technology
25.32%
Finance
18.98%
Healthcare
12.79%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.39%
Energy
8.50%
Industrials
7.79%
Other
17.22%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZBVU
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.36%
Bank of America Corp.
4.12%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.56%
Target Corp.
3.24%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
3.22%
Visa, Inc.
3.19%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
3.16%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.04%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
2.99%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.99%
CLU.C
Apple, Inc.
4.37%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.43%
Microsoft Corp.
2.82%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.19%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.89%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.76%
Intel Corp.
1.73%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.70%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.39%
Chevron Corp.
1.34%
Diversification
ZBVU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 56 total
33.88%
CLU.C
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 988 total
22.62%
Characteristics
Compare
ZBVU
CLU.C
| Provider | BMO | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.71% | 1.10% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 21, 2025 | April 7, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about ZBVU and CLU.C
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZBVU or CLU.C?
As of October 20, 2026, ZBVU has returned 19.12% year to date, while CLU.C has returned 20.54%. CLU.C is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZBVU or CLU.C?
As of October 20, 2026, ZBVU manages $10.63 M in assets, while CLU.C manages $102.04 M. CLU.C is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZBVU and CLU.C managed?
ZBVU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. CLU.C is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZBVU and CLU.C emphasize?
ZBVU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. CLU.C is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZBVU or CLU.C?
Year to date, ZBVU has seen +$1.83 M in net flows, compared with -$8.52 M for CLU.C. ZBVU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZBVU and CLU.C compare?
ZBVU has an expense ratio of 0.51%, while CLU.C has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of ZBVU and CLU.C?
ZBVU's largest holdings include Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Bank of America Corp., and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. CLU.C's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZBVU or CLU.C?
ZBVU holds 56 securities, while CLU.C holds 988. On holdings count, CLU.C is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.