VS
Compare BMO US Large Cap Disciplined Value ETF (ZBVU) vs JPMorgan US Value Active ETF (JAVA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZBVU and JAVA provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZBVU features a management fee (MER) of 0.51%, compared to 0.44% for JAVA. Performance-wise, ZBVU has returned 18.75% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas JAVA is at 18.09% with +$97 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZBVU
JAVA
| AuM | $10.60 M | $118.09 M |
| Management Fees | 0.51% | 0.44% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.51% | 0.44% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZBVU | -0.98% | +0.27% | +18.75% | +20.72% | - |
JAVA | +1.26% | +3.21% | +18.09% | +19.72% | - | |
| Flows | ZBVU | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$0 M | - |
JAVA | +$0 M | +$73 M | +$97 M | +$101 M | - |
ZBVU vs JAVA exposure
Countries
ZBVU
USA
94.93%
JAVA
USA
95.23%
Sectors
ZBVU
Finance
32.43%
Technology
16.34%
Healthcare
10.46%
Industrials
9.61%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.06%
Other
24.10%
JAVA
Finance
23.76%
Technology
21.03%
Healthcare
12.75%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.87%
Industrials
8.39%
Other
22.19%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZBVU
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.36%
Bank of America Corp.
4.12%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.56%
Target Corp.
3.24%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
3.22%
Visa, Inc.
3.19%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
3.16%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.04%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
2.99%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.99%
JAVA
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.28%
Microsoft Corp.
5.88%
Apple, Inc.
3.05%
Bank of America Corp.
2.46%
Wells Fargo & Co.
2.22%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.81%
Morgan Stanley
1.61%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.52%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.50%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.47%
Diversification
ZBVU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 56 total
33.88%
JAVA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 155 total
28.79%
Characteristics
Compare
ZBVU
JAVA
| Provider | BMO | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.71% | 0.51% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 21, 2025 | March 19, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZBVU and JAVA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZBVU or JAVA?
As of October 19, 2026, ZBVU has returned 18.75% year to date, while JAVA has returned 18.09%. ZBVU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZBVU or JAVA?
As of October 19, 2026, ZBVU manages $10.60 M in assets, while JAVA manages $118.09 M. JAVA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZBVU and JAVA managed?
ZBVU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. JAVA is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZBVU and JAVA emphasize?
ZBVU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. JAVA is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZBVU or JAVA?
Year to date, ZBVU has seen +$1.83 M in net flows, compared with +$96.64 M for JAVA. JAVA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZBVU and JAVA compare?
ZBVU has an expense ratio of 0.51%, while JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44%.
What are the top holdings of ZBVU and JAVA?
ZBVU's largest holdings include Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Bank of America Corp., and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. JAVA's top holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZBVU or JAVA?
ZBVU holds 56 securities, while JAVA holds 155. On holdings count, JAVA is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.