ZCDX
BMO Credit Stress Opportunities ETF

Full ZCDX fund page
VS
RUQQ
RBC Target 2028 U.S. Corporate Bond ETF

Full RUQQ fund page

BMO Credit Stress Opportunities ETF (ZCDX) and RBC Target 2028 U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUQQ) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZCDX focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Healthcare, while RUQQ leans towards Finance, Utilities, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZCDX features a management fee (MER) of 0.51%, compared to 0.2% for RUQQ. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.0-0.50.00.51.0%Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9Sep 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 18, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZCDX
+0.70%----
RUQQ
+0.43%-0.57%+3.06%+3.52%-
Flows
ZCDX
+$0 M----
RUQQ
-$6 M+$16 M+$29 M+$33 M-

ZCDX vs RUQQ exposure

Countries

ZCDX
USA
93.20%
Canada
10.59%
RUQQ
USA
84.16%
Other
15.84%

Sectors

ZCDX
Finance
37.56%
Technology
27.16%
Healthcare
21.61%
Sovereign
16.35%
RUQQ
Finance
40.34%
Utilities
9.97%
Other
49.69%
As of September 18, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZCDX
Cisco Systems, 4.8% 26feb2027, USD
5.94%
Astrazeneca Finance, 4.8% 26feb2027, USD
5.94%
Apple, 3.35% 9feb2027, USD
5.90%
Cigna Group, 3.4% 1mar2027, USD
5.89%
Applied Materials, 3.3% 1apr2027, USD
5.89%
Gilead Sciences, 2.95% 1mar2027, USD
5.88%
Bank of America Corporation, 2.551% 4feb2028, USD (N)
5.87%
Bank of Montreal, 2.65% 8mar2027, USD (F)
5.87%
JP Morgan, 2.182% 1jun2028, USD
5.81%
The Coca-Cola Company, 1.45% 1jun2027, USD
5.79%
RUQQ
Morgan Stanley, 3.772% 24jan2029, USD (I)
3.15%
JP Morgan, 4.203% 23jul2029, USD
3.12%
Bank of America Corporation, 2.087% 14jun2029, USD (N)
3.05%
Citigroup, 4.075% 23apr2029, USD
2.97%
Goldman Sachs, 4.223% 1may2029, USD
2.92%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, 3.961% 2mar2028, USD
2.87%
Amazon.com, 1.65% 12may2028, USD
2.65%
Apple, 1.4% 5aug2028, USD
2.47%
BNY Mellon, 4.543% 1feb2029, USD (J)
2.45%
John Deere Capital, 4.95% 14jul2028, USD (I)
2.32%

Diversification

ZCDX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21 total
58.80%
RUQQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 65 total
27.97%

Characteristics

Compare
ZCDX
RUQQ
ProviderBMORBC Global Asset Management
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassFixed IncomeFixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-3.31%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJuly 27, 2026April 24, 2024

Frequently asked questions about ZCDX and RUQQ

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZCDX or RUQQ?
As of September 18, 2026, ZCDX manages $1.48 M in assets, while RUQQ manages $78.15 M. RUQQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZCDX and RUQQ managed?
ZCDX is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. RUQQ is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZCDX and RUQQ emphasize?
ZCDX is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. RUQQ is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Healthcare.
How do the fees of ZCDX and RUQQ compare?
ZCDX has an expense ratio of 0.51%, while RUQQ has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What are the top holdings of ZCDX and RUQQ?
ZCDX's largest holdings include Cisco Systems, 4.8% 26feb2027, USD, Astrazeneca Finance, 4.8% 26feb2027, USD, and Apple, 3.35% 9feb2027, USD. RUQQ's top holdings include Morgan Stanley, 3.772% 24jan2029, USD (I), JP Morgan, 4.203% 23jul2029, USD, and Bank of America Corporation, 2.087% 14jun2029, USD (N).
Which ETF is more diversified: ZCDX or RUQQ?
ZCDX holds 21 securities, while RUQQ holds 65. On holdings count, RUQQ is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds