VS
BMO Credit Stress Opportunities ETF (ZCDX) and RBC Target 2031 U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUQT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZCDX focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Healthcare, while RUQT leans towards Finance, Technology, and Utilities. When evaluating costs, ZCDX features a management fee (MER) of 0.51%, compared to 0.2% for RUQT. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZCDX
RUQT
| AuM | $1.48 M | $30.72 M |
| Management Fees | 0.51% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.51% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 18, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZCDX | +0.70% | - | - | - | - |
RUQT | -0.69% | -2.48% | +0.25% | +0.50% | - | |
| Flows | ZCDX | +$0 M | - | - | - | - |
RUQT | +$1 M | +$5 M | +$12 M | +$22 M | - |
ZCDX vs RUQT exposure
Countries
ZCDX
USA
93.20%
Canada
10.59%
RUQT
USA
88.43%
Other
11.57%
Sectors
ZCDX
Finance
37.56%
Technology
27.16%
Healthcare
21.61%
Sovereign
16.35%
RUQT
Finance
40.94%
Technology
11.88%
Utilities
10.54%
Healthcare
9.00%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.44%
Other
19.20%
As of September 18, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZCDX
Cisco Systems, 4.8% 26feb2027, USD
5.94%
Astrazeneca Finance, 4.8% 26feb2027, USD
5.94%
Apple, 3.35% 9feb2027, USD
5.90%
Cigna Group, 3.4% 1mar2027, USD
5.89%
Applied Materials, 3.3% 1apr2027, USD
5.89%
Gilead Sciences, 2.95% 1mar2027, USD
5.88%
Bank of America Corporation, 2.551% 4feb2028, USD (N)
5.87%
Bank of Montreal, 2.65% 8mar2027, USD (F)
5.87%
JP Morgan, 2.182% 1jun2028, USD
5.81%
The Coca-Cola Company, 1.45% 1jun2027, USD
5.79%
RUQT
JP Morgan, 1.953% 4feb2032, USD
2.98%
Bank of America Corporation, 2.299% 21jul2032, USD (N)
2.96%
Morgan Stanley, 1.794% 13feb2032, USD (I)
2.73%
HSBC Holdings plc, 2.871% 22nov2032, USD
2.67%
Citigroup, 2.561% 1may2032, USD
2.60%
State Street, 4.675% 22oct2032, USD
2.37%
Texas Instruments, 1.9% 15sep2031, USD
2.37%
Caterpillar, 1.9% 12mar2031, USD
2.31%
Meta Platforms, 4.55% 15aug2031, USD
2.29%
Amazon.com, 2.1% 12may2031, USD
2.28%
Diversification
ZCDX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21 total
58.80%
RUQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 68 total
25.55%
Characteristics
Compare
ZCDX
RUQT
| Provider | BMO | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.54% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 27, 2026 | April 1, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZCDX and RUQT
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZCDX or RUQT?
As of September 18, 2026, ZCDX manages $1.48 M in assets, while RUQT manages $30.72 M. RUQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZCDX and RUQT managed?
ZCDX is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. RUQT is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZCDX and RUQT emphasize?
ZCDX is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. RUQT is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Utilities.
How do the fees of ZCDX and RUQT compare?
ZCDX has an expense ratio of 0.51%, while RUQT has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What are the top holdings of ZCDX and RUQT?
ZCDX's largest holdings include Cisco Systems, 4.8% 26feb2027, USD, Astrazeneca Finance, 4.8% 26feb2027, USD, and Apple, 3.35% 9feb2027, USD. RUQT's top holdings include JP Morgan, 1.953% 4feb2032, USD, Bank of America Corporation, 2.299% 21jul2032, USD (N), and Morgan Stanley, 1.794% 13feb2032, USD (I).
Which ETF is more diversified: ZCDX or RUQT?
ZCDX holds 21 securities, while RUQT holds 68. On holdings count, RUQT is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.