VS
When evaluating costs, ZCOM features a management fee (MER) of 0.29%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, ZCOM has returned 21.06% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 12.49% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZCOM
XIC
| AuM | $582.79 M | $30,979.89 M |
| Management Fees | 0.29% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.29% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 7, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZCOM | -2.97% | -5.53% | +21.06% | - | - |
XIC | +2.55% | +6.68% | +12.49% | +33.53% | +93.02% | |
| Flows | ZCOM | -$352 M | -$442 M | +$10 M | - | - |
XIC | +$671 M | +$2,133 M | +$6,204 M | +$7,667 M | +$12,298 M |
ZCOM vs XIC exposure
Countries
ZCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.41%
Sectors
ZCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
39.60%
Non-Energy Materials
18.18%
Energy
16.99%
Industrials
8.23%
Other
16.99%
As of July 7, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.42%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.32%
Shopify, Inc.
4.05%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.32%
Bank of Montreal
3.18%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.81%
Brookfield Corp.
2.78%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.74%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.62%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.55%
Diversification
ZCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 220 total
36.78%
Characteristics
Compare
ZCOM
XIC
| Provider | BMO | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return Index - USD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 23, 2025 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about ZCOM and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZCOM or XIC?
As of July 7, 2026, ZCOM has returned 21.06% year to date, while XIC has returned 12.49%. ZCOM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZCOM or XIC?
As of July 7, 2026, ZCOM manages $582.79 M in assets, while XIC manages $30.98 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZCOM and XIC managed?
ZCOM is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return Index - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZCOM or XIC?
Year to date, ZCOM has seen +$10.04 M in net flows, compared with +$6,203.86 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZCOM and XIC compare?
ZCOM has an expense ratio of 0.29%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about ZCOM and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.