ZEA
BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Full ZEA fund page
VS
IMAX
Hamilton International Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF

Full IMAX fund page

BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA) and Hamilton International Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (IMAX) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZEA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Industrials, and Technology, while IMAX leans towards Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, ZEA features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.65% for IMAX. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 7Sep 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 15, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZEA
-2.57%+0.34%+12.78%+17.11%+65.30%
IMAX
-1.89%+0.99%---
Flows
ZEA
+$107 M+$810 M+$877 M+$995 M+$2,750 M
IMAX
+$6 M+$20 M---

ZEA vs IMAX exposure

Countries

ZEA
Japan
24.83%
United Kingdom
13.79%
Switzerland
9.29%
France
8.17%
Germany
8.11%
Australia
7.07%
Other
28.75%
IMAX
Japan
23.97%
United Kingdom
13.97%
Switzerland
9.73%
France
8.57%
Germany
8.50%
Other
35.27%

Sectors

ZEA
Finance
27.47%
Industrials
16.39%
Technology
11.86%
Healthcare
9.39%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.10%
Non-Energy Materials
7.46%
Other
19.34%
IMAX
Finance
27.90%
Industrials
16.26%
Technology
12.00%
Healthcare
9.74%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.25%
Non-Energy Materials
7.12%
Other
18.73%
As of September 15, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZEA
ASML Holding NV
2.51%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.42%
Roche Holding AG
1.20%
Novartis AG
1.12%
Nestlé SA
1.03%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.01%
Shell Plc
0.98%
Siemens AG
0.94%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.92%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.82%
IMAX
ASML Holding NV
2.73%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.55%
Roche Holding AG
1.30%
Novartis AG
1.22%
Nestlé SA
1.12%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.10%
Shell Plc
1.06%
Siemens AG
1.02%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.00%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.89%

Diversification

ZEA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,608 total
11.96%
IMAX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,608 total
13.00%

Characteristics

Compare
ZEA
IMAX
ProviderBMOHamilton ETFs
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkMSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.92%-
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 10, 2014May 8, 2026

Frequently asked questions about ZEA and IMAX

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZEA or IMAX?
As of September 15, 2026, ZEA manages $13.47 B in assets, while IMAX manages $26.15 M. ZEA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZEA and IMAX managed?
ZEA is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. IMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZEA and IMAX emphasize?
ZEA is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. IMAX is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
How do the fees of ZEA and IMAX compare?
ZEA has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while IMAX has an expense ratio of 0.65%.
What are the top holdings of ZEA and IMAX?
ZEA's largest holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG. IMAX's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZEA or IMAX?
ZEA holds 2596 securities, while IMAX holds 2596. On holdings count, ZEA is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZEA and IMAX

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds