VS
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) and CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (CCCB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZEB focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, while CCCB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, ZEB features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.35% for CCCB. Performance-wise, ZEB has returned 21.08% year-to-date with -$1,247 M in net flows, whereas CCCB is at 18.54% with +$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZEB
CCCB
| AuM | $5,289.57 M | $7.12 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.28% | 0.35% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.67% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 26, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZEB | +7.08% | +11.87% | +21.08% | +65.27% | +137.93% |
CCCB | +6.28% | +10.74% | +18.54% | - | - | |
| Flows | ZEB | -$329 M | -$500 M | -$1,247 M | -$1,025 M | -$1,908 M |
CCCB | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$3 M | - | - |
ZEB vs CCCB exposure
Countries
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
CCCB
Canada
100.51%
Sectors
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
CCCB
Financials
100.51%
As of May 26, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZEB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.14%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
BNS
16.62%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.48%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.40%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.33%
CCCB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.04%
BNS
16.94%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.93%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.44%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.42%
Diversification
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
CCCB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.51%
Characteristics
Compare
ZEB
CCCB
| Provider | BMO | CIBC |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.49% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 20, 2009 | August 25, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZEB and CCCB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZEB or CCCB?
As of May 26, 2026, ZEB has returned 21.08% year to date, while CCCB has returned 18.54%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZEB or CCCB?
As of May 26, 2026, ZEB manages $5.29 B in assets, while CCCB manages $7.12 M. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZEB and CCCB managed?
ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. CCCB is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZEB and CCCB emphasize?
ZEB is most exposed to Financials. CCCB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZEB or CCCB?
Year to date, ZEB has seen -$1,246.55 M in net flows, compared with +$2.60 M for CCCB. CCCB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZEB and CCCB compare?
ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while CCCB has an expense ratio of 0.35%.
What are the top holdings of ZEB and CCCB?
ZEB's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS. CCCB's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, BNS, and ROYAL BK CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZEB or CCCB?
ZEB holds 6 securities, while CCCB holds 6. On holdings count, ZEB is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZEB and CCCB

Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.




