ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page
VS
HEB
Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF

Full HEB fund page

Compare BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) vs Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZEB and HEB provide the same top sector exposures: Financials. When evaluating costs, ZEB features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.19% for HEB. Performance-wise, ZEB has returned 4.2% year-to-date with -$723 M in net flows, whereas HEB is at 4.23% with +$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Mar 6Mar 13Mar 20Mar 27Apr 6

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 6, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZEB
+0.88%+3.08%+4.20%+65.52%+102.53%
HEB
+0.89%+3.11%+4.23%+65.82%+102.94%
Flows
ZEB
+$311 M-$835 M-$723 M-$1,943 M-$1,208 M
HEB
-$24 M+$3 M+$3 M+$49 M+$521 M

ZEB vs HEB exposure

Countries

ZEB
Canada
100.00%
HEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

ZEB
Financials
100.00%
HEB
Financials
100.00%
As of April 6, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZEB
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.54%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.45%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.23%
BNS
16.23%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.78%
ROYAL BK CANADA
15.77%
HEB
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.60%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.40%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.20%
BNS
16.30%
ROYAL BK CANADA
15.90%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.60%

Diversification

ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
HEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
ZEB
HEB
ProviderBMOHamilton ETFs
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.88%3.18%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 20, 2009April 3, 2023

Frequently asked questions about ZEB and HEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZEB or HEB?
As of April 6, 2026, ZEB has returned 4.20% year to date, while HEB has returned 4.23%. HEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZEB or HEB?
As of April 6, 2026, ZEB manages $5.05 B in assets, while HEB manages $1.07 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZEB and HEB managed?
ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HEB is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZEB and HEB emphasize?
ZEB is most exposed to Financials. HEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZEB or HEB?
Year to date, ZEB has seen -$723.44 M in net flows, compared with +$2.80 M for HEB. HEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZEB and HEB compare?
ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while HEB has an expense ratio of 0.25%.
What are the top holdings of ZEB and HEB?
ZEB's largest holdings include CDN IMPERIAL BK, NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, and TORONTO DOMINION. HEB's top holdings include NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZEB or HEB?
ZEB holds 6 securities, while HEB holds 6. On holdings count, ZEB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZEB and HEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds