ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Compare BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZEB and HEWB provide the same top sector exposures: Financials. When evaluating costs, ZEB features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, ZEB has returned 15.15% year-to-date with -$1,031 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 15.13% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.02.04.06.08.0%Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22Apr 29May 6

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 8, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZEB
+7.87%+10.14%+15.15%+64.67%+121.52%
HEWB
+7.89%+10.14%+15.13%+64.53%+121.30%
Flows
ZEB
-$289 M-$565 M-$1,031 M-$1,629 M-$1,467 M
HEWB
+$5 M+$9 M+$12 M+$7 M-$3 M

ZEB vs HEWB exposure

Countries

ZEB
Canada
100.00%
HEWB
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

ZEB
Financials
100.00%
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of May 8, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZEB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.14%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
BNS
16.62%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.48%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.40%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.33%
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%

Diversification

ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
ZEB
HEWB
ProviderBMOGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.62%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 20, 2009January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about ZEB and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZEB or HEWB?
As of May 8, 2026, ZEB has returned 15.15% year to date, while HEWB has returned 15.13%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZEB or HEWB?
As of May 8, 2026, ZEB manages $5.24 B in assets, while HEWB manages $290.50 M. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZEB and HEWB managed?
ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZEB and HEWB emphasize?
ZEB is most exposed to Financials. HEWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZEB or HEWB?
Year to date, ZEB has seen -$1,030.81 M in net flows, compared with +$12.19 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZEB and HEWB compare?
ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of ZEB and HEWB?
ZEB's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS. HEWB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZEB or HEWB?
ZEB holds 6 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, ZEB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZEB and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds