ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page
VS
RBNK
RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF

Full RBNK fund page

Compare BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) vs RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZEB and RBNK provide the same top sector exposures: Financials. When evaluating costs, ZEB features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.29% for RBNK. Performance-wise, ZEB has returned 4.2% year-to-date with -$723 M in net flows, whereas RBNK is at 4.13% with +$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Mar 6Mar 13Mar 20Mar 27Apr 6

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 6, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZEB
+0.88%+3.08%+4.20%+65.52%+102.53%
RBNK
+0.48%+2.95%+4.13%+64.89%+102.23%
Flows
ZEB
+$311 M-$835 M-$723 M-$1,943 M-$1,208 M
RBNK
-$8 M+$0 M+$0 M+$16 M-$29 M

ZEB vs RBNK exposure

Countries

ZEB
Canada
100.00%
RBNK
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

ZEB
Financials
100.00%
RBNK
Financials
100.00%
As of April 6, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZEB
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.54%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.45%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.23%
BNS
16.23%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.78%
ROYAL BK CANADA
15.77%
RBNK
BANK OF MONTREAL
25.06%
BNS
24.04%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.26%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.47%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
9.24%
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.93%

Diversification

ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
RBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
ZEB
RBNK
ProviderBMORBC Global Asset Management
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CADSolactive Canada Bank Yield Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.88%3.40%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 20, 2009October 20, 2017

Frequently asked questions about ZEB and RBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZEB or RBNK?
As of April 6, 2026, ZEB has returned 4.20% year to date, while RBNK has returned 4.13%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZEB or RBNK?
As of April 6, 2026, ZEB manages $5.05 B in assets, while RBNK manages $388.45 M. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZEB and RBNK managed?
ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. RBNK is passively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Canada Bank Yield Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZEB and RBNK emphasize?
ZEB is most exposed to Financials. RBNK is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZEB or RBNK?
Year to date, ZEB has seen -$723.44 M in net flows, compared with +$0.10 M for RBNK. RBNK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZEB and RBNK compare?
ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while RBNK has an expense ratio of 0.32%.
What are the top holdings of ZEB and RBNK?
ZEB's largest holdings include CDN IMPERIAL BK, NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, and TORONTO DOMINION. RBNK's top holdings include BANK OF MONTREAL, BNS, and CDN IMPERIAL BK.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZEB or RBNK?
ZEB holds 6 securities, while RBNK holds 6. On holdings count, ZEB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZEB and RBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds