Compare BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT) vs CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZEQT and CEQT provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.22% for CEQT. Performance-wise, ZEQT has returned 12.83% year-to-date with +$339 M in net flows, whereas CEQT is at 12.71% with +$19 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZEQT
CEQT
| AuM | $890.17 M | $49.98 M |
| Management Fees | 0.18% | 0.22% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.20% | 0.29% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZEQT | -0.91% | +5.18% | +12.83% | +25.61% | +77.75% |
CEQT | -1.27% | +4.66% | +12.71% | +25.99% | +77.12% | |
| Flows | ZEQT | +$60 M | +$177 M | +$339 M | +$508 M | +$713 M |
CEQT | -$2 M | +$5 M | +$19 M | +$28 M | +$40 M |
ZEQT vs CEQT exposure
Countries
ZEQT
USA
49.34%
Canada
22.94%
Other
27.72%
CEQT
USA
38.90%
Canada
28.05%
Other
33.05%
Sectors
ZEQT
Technology
29.46%
Finance
22.30%
Industrials
9.55%
Non-Energy Materials
7.63%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.09%
Other
23.97%
CEQT
Technology
25.87%
Finance
23.92%
Industrials
9.95%
Non-Energy Materials
9.02%
Energy
7.35%
Other
23.90%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZEQT
NVIDIA Corp.
3.69%
Apple, Inc.
3.25%
Microsoft Corp.
2.25%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.90%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.75%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.61%
Broadcom Inc.
1.43%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.28%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.26%
CEQT
NVIDIA Corp.
2.74%
Apple, Inc.
2.48%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.12%
Microsoft Corp.
1.84%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.53%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.45%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.31%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.23%
Broadcom Inc.
1.15%
Shopify, Inc.
1.12%
Diversification
ZEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5,532 total
19.86%
CEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6,761 total
16.98%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ZEQT and CEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZEQT or CEQT?
As of July 17, 2026, ZEQT has returned 12.83% year to date, while CEQT has returned 12.71%. ZEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZEQT or CEQT?
As of July 17, 2026, ZEQT manages $890.17 M in assets, while CEQT manages $49.98 M. ZEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZEQT and CEQT managed?
ZEQT is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. CEQT is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZEQT and CEQT emphasize?
ZEQT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. CEQT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZEQT or CEQT?
Year to date, ZEQT has seen +$339.14 M in net flows, compared with +$19.45 M for CEQT. ZEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZEQT and CEQT compare?
ZEQT has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while CEQT has an expense ratio of 0.29%.
What are the top holdings of ZEQT and CEQT?
ZEQT's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. CEQT's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZEQT or CEQT?
ZEQT holds 5445 securities, while CEQT holds 6656. On holdings count, CEQT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZEQT and CEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.