ZEQT
BMO All-Equity ETF

Full ZEQT fund page
VS
CEQY
CIBC All-Equity ETF Portfolio ETF

Full CEQY fund page

Compare BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT) vs CIBC All-Equity ETF Portfolio ETF (CEQY) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZEQT and CEQY provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.15% for CEQY. Performance-wise, ZEQT has returned 15.14% year-to-date with +$433 M in net flows, whereas CEQY is at 14.83% with +$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.5%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZEQT
-1.36%+1.40%+15.14%+24.51%+78.78%
CEQY
-1.34%+1.69%+14.83%+23.20%-
Flows
ZEQT
+$66 M+$195 M+$433 M+$565 M+$802 M
CEQY
+$1 M+$4 M+$7 M+$7 M-

ZEQT vs CEQY exposure

Countries

ZEQT
USA
47.96%
Canada
24.63%
Other
27.41%
CEQY
USA
44.24%
Canada
26.51%
Other
29.25%

Sectors

ZEQT
Technology
27.27%
Finance
24.57%
Industrials
9.37%
Non-Energy Materials
7.15%
Other
31.65%
CEQY
Technology
25.78%
Finance
25.14%
Industrials
9.51%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.29%
Non-Energy Materials
7.15%
Energy
7.02%
Other
18.10%
As of September 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZEQT
Apple, Inc.
3.46%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.34%
Microsoft Corp.
2.37%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.63%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.41%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.38%
Broadcom Inc.
1.30%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.28%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.11%
CEQY
NVIDIA Corp.
3.25%
Apple, Inc.
3.18%
Microsoft Corp.
2.30%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.26%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.84%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.54%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.45%
Broadcom Inc.
1.23%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.15%
Shopify, Inc.
1.11%

Diversification

ZEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5,508 total
19.36%
CEQY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6,245 total
19.30%

Characteristics

Compare
ZEQT
CEQY
ProviderBMOCIBC
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.27%0.65%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 17, 2022August 25, 2025

Frequently asked questions about ZEQT and CEQY

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZEQT or CEQY?
As of September 2, 2026, ZEQT has returned 15.14% year to date, while CEQY has returned 14.83%. ZEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZEQT or CEQY?
As of September 2, 2026, ZEQT manages $1.00 B in assets, while CEQY manages $8.80 M. ZEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZEQT and CEQY managed?
ZEQT is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. CEQY is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZEQT and CEQY emphasize?
ZEQT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. CEQY is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZEQT or CEQY?
Year to date, ZEQT has seen +$432.64 M in net flows, compared with +$6.95 M for CEQY. ZEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZEQT and CEQY compare?
ZEQT has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while CEQY has an expense ratio of 0.15%.
What are the top holdings of ZEQT and CEQY?
ZEQT's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. CEQY's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZEQT or CEQY?
ZEQT holds 5411 securities, while CEQY holds 6116. On holdings count, CEQY is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZEQT and CEQY

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds