ZESG
BMO Balanced ESG ETF

Full ZESG fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

BMO Balanced ESG ETF (ZESG) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZESG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Sovereign, and Municipal, while HEWB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, ZESG features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, ZESG has returned 7.06% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 28.02% with +$14 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0246810%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZESG
+3.63%+7.60%+7.06%+18.72%+51.15%
HEWB
+10.08%+24.67%+28.02%+71.33%+148.16%
Flows
ZESG
+$0 M+$1 M+$4 M+$14 M+$27 M
HEWB
+$2 M+$10 M+$14 M+$11 M+$16 M

ZESG vs HEWB exposure

Countries

ZESG
Canada
49.13%
USA
37.52%
Other
13.35%
HEWB
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

ZESG
Information Technology
16.90%
Sovereign
10.83%
Municipal
10.54%
Financials
10.07%
Other
51.66%
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of June 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZESG
NVIDIA
5.48%
MICROSOFT-T
3.23%
Canada, Bond 1.25 1jun2030 10Y
2.52%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.19%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.82%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.69%
Canada, Bonds 2% 1jun2032, CAD
1.51%
Canada, Bonds 1.5% 1dec2031 10Y
1.48%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
1.42%
Canada, Bonds 3.5% 1mar2028, CAD
1.37%
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%

Diversification

ZESG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,477 total
22.71%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
ZESG
HEWB
ProviderBMOGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.64%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaYesNo
Inception DateJanuary 16, 2020January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about ZESG and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZESG or HEWB?
As of June 17, 2026, ZESG has returned 7.06% year to date, while HEWB has returned 28.02%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZESG or HEWB?
As of June 17, 2026, ZESG manages $104.81 M in assets, while HEWB manages $324.95 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZESG and HEWB managed?
ZESG is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZESG and HEWB emphasize?
ZESG is most exposed to Information Technology, Sovereign, and Municipal. HEWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZESG or HEWB?
Year to date, ZESG has seen +$4.31 M in net flows, compared with +$14.05 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZESG and HEWB compare?
ZESG has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of ZESG and HEWB?
ZESG's largest holdings include NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL. HEWB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZESG or HEWB?
ZESG holds 1349 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, ZESG is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZESG and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds