ZFL
BMO Long Federal Bond Index ETF

Full ZFL fund page
VS
CBIL
Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF

Full CBIL fund page

BMO Long Federal Bond Index ETF (ZFL) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZFL focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Sovereign, while CBIL leans towards Sovereign. When evaluating costs, ZFL features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.1% for CBIL. Performance-wise, ZFL has returned 4.26% year-to-date with +$117 M in net flows, whereas CBIL is at 1.54% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZFL
-1.68%-6.32%-4.26%-7.38%-0.91%
CBIL
+0.18%+0.55%+1.54%+2.23%+7.23%
Flows
ZFL
+$28 M+$77 M+$117 M-$2,346 M-$1,060 M
CBIL
+$249 M+$420 M+$1,199 M+$1,191 M+$2,329 M

ZFL vs CBIL exposure

Countries

ZFL
Canada
100.00%
CBIL
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

ZFL
Sovereign
100.00%
CBIL
Sovereign
99.99%
As of September 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZFL
Canada, Bonds 3.5% 1dec2057, CAD
22.02%
Canada, Bond 2 1jan2051 30Y
20.08%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1dec2055, CAD
14.90%
Canada, Bond 3.5 1dec2045 30Y
14.77%
Canada, Bond 2.75 1dec2048 30Y
11.40%
Canada, Bond 1.75 1dec2053 30Y
9.75%
Canada, Bond 4 1jun2041 30Y
7.08%
CBIL
Canada, Bills 0% 9nov2023, CAD (364D)
99.99%

Diversification

ZFL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 7 total
100.00%
CBIL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
ZFL
CBIL
ProviderBMOGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkFTSE TMX Canada Long Term Federal Bond TR Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeFixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.00%2.22%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 19, 2010April 12, 2023

Frequently asked questions about ZFL and CBIL

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZFL or CBIL?
As of September 16, 2026, ZFL has returned -4.26% year to date, while CBIL has returned 1.54%. CBIL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZFL or CBIL?
As of September 16, 2026, ZFL manages $1.29 B in assets, while CBIL manages $2.79 B. CBIL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZFL and CBIL managed?
ZFL is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the FTSE TMX Canada Long Term Federal Bond TR Index - CAD benchmark. CBIL is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZFL and CBIL emphasize?
ZFL is most exposed to Sovereign. CBIL is most exposed to Sovereign.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZFL or CBIL?
Year to date, ZFL has seen +$116.54 M in net flows, compared with +$1,198.95 M for CBIL. CBIL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZFL and CBIL compare?
ZFL has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while CBIL has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
What are the top holdings of ZFL and CBIL?
ZFL's largest holdings include Canada, Bonds 3.5% 1dec2057, CAD, Canada, Bond 2 1jan2051 30Y, and Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1dec2055, CAD. CBIL's top holdings include Canada, Bills 0% 9nov2023, CAD (364D).
Which ETF is more diversified: ZFL or CBIL?
ZFL holds 7 securities, while CBIL holds 1. On holdings count, ZFL is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZFL and CBIL

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds