ZGIF
BMO Global Infrastructure Fund Active ETF Series

Full ZGIF fund page
VS
QIF
AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF

Full QIF fund page

Compare BMO Global Infrastructure Fund Active ETF Series (ZGIF) vs AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF (QIF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZGIF and QIF provide the same top sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, ZGIF features a management fee (MER) of 1.19%, compared to 0.45% for QIF. Performance-wise, ZGIF has returned 8.01% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas QIF is at 8.88% with -$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.0%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZGIF
+2.58%-3.20%+8.01%+4.92%+64.66%
QIF
+2.56%-4.11%+8.88%+5.07%+59.27%
Flows
ZGIF
+$0 M+$1 M+$2 M+$2 M-$18 M
QIF
-$0 M+$3 M-$7 M-$7 M-$130 M

ZGIF vs QIF exposure

Countries

ZGIF
USA
47.69%
Canada
11.85%
Spain
10.40%
Other
30.05%
QIF
USA
50.17%
Spain
12.48%
Canada
9.54%
Other
27.80%

Sectors

ZGIF
Utilities
52.57%
Industrials
27.73%
Energy
15.18%
QIF
Utilities
47.54%
Industrials
20.39%
Energy
19.28%
Other
12.80%
As of October 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZGIF
Aena S.M.E. SA
6.33%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
5.38%
Duke Energy Corp.
4.47%
Transurban Group Ltd.
4.44%
Iberdrola SA
4.08%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.76%
The Southern Co.
3.70%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
3.26%
GEK Terna SA
3.16%
Union Pacific Corp.
3.14%
QIF
Iberdrola SA
5.84%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.99%
Aena S.M.E. SA
4.62%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
3.31%
Enel SpA
3.03%
Constellation Energy Corp.
2.52%
TC Energy Corp.
2.46%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
2.43%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.39%
Entergy Corp.
2.25%

Diversification

ZGIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 38 total
41.70%
QIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 83 total
33.83%

Characteristics

Compare
ZGIF
QIF
ProviderBMOAGF
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method--
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.83%3.85%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 26, 2023February 12, 2018

Frequently asked questions about ZGIF and QIF

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZGIF or QIF?
As of October 16, 2026, ZGIF has returned 8.01% year to date, while QIF has returned 8.88%. QIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZGIF or QIF?
As of October 16, 2026, ZGIF manages $3.19 M in assets, while QIF manages $142.59 M. QIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZGIF and QIF managed?
ZGIF is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. QIF is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZGIF and QIF emphasize?
ZGIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. QIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZGIF or QIF?
Year to date, ZGIF has seen +$2.14 M in net flows, compared with -$7.22 M for QIF. ZGIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZGIF and QIF compare?
ZGIF has an expense ratio of 1.16%, while QIF has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of ZGIF and QIF?
ZGIF's largest holdings include Aena S.M.E. SA, NextEra Energy, Inc., and Duke Energy Corp.. QIF's top holdings include Iberdrola SA, Enbridge, Inc., and Aena S.M.E. SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZGIF or QIF?
ZGIF holds 38 securities, while QIF holds 83. On holdings count, QIF is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZGIF and QIF

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds