ZGQ
BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF

Full ZGQ fund page
VS
GEDG
Manulife Global Edge ETF

Full GEDG fund page

Compare BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ) vs Manulife Global Edge ETF (GEDG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZGQ provides Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials exposures, while GEDG is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZGQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.5% for GEDG. Performance-wise, ZGQ has returned 17.25% year-to-date with +$86 M in net flows, whereas GEDG is at 10.59% with +$15 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.0%Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3Nov 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZGQ
-1.83%+0.61%+17.25%+16.50%+75.19%
GEDG
-0.98%-0.38%+10.59%--
Flows
ZGQ
+$23 M+$41 M+$86 M+$79 M+$514 M
GEDG
-$1 M+$3 M+$15 M--

ZGQ vs GEDG exposure

Countries

ZGQ
USA
69.55%
Taiwan
7.49%
Other
22.96%
GEDG
USA
64.88%
Other
35.12%

Sectors

ZGQ
Technology
53.65%
Healthcare
13.17%
Industrials
9.16%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.31%
Finance
7.55%
Other
8.16%
GEDG
Technology
44.09%
Finance
14.60%
Healthcare
10.60%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.41%
Industrials
7.81%
Other
13.49%
As of November 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZGQ
Microsoft Corp.
5.83%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.39%
Apple, Inc.
5.26%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.17%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.92%
Broadcom Inc.
4.13%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.96%
ASML Holding NV
2.70%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.35%
Visa, Inc.
2.21%
GEDG
NVIDIA Corp.
6.49%
Microsoft Corp.
5.13%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.91%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.04%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.96%
Apple, Inc.
3.33%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.92%
Broadcom Inc.
2.89%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.65%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.43%

Diversification

ZGQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 482 total
40.92%
GEDG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 62 total
38.76%

Characteristics

Compare
ZGQ
GEDG
ProviderBMOManulife Investments
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkMSCI ACWI Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)-
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.48%-
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 5, 2014November 24, 2025

Frequently asked questions about ZGQ and GEDG

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZGQ or GEDG?
As of November 11, 2026, ZGQ has returned 17.25% year to date, while GEDG has returned 10.59%. ZGQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZGQ or GEDG?
As of November 11, 2026, ZGQ manages $1.33 B in assets, while GEDG manages $26.70 M. ZGQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZGQ and GEDG managed?
ZGQ is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI ACWI Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. GEDG is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZGQ and GEDG emphasize?
ZGQ is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials. GEDG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZGQ or GEDG?
Year to date, ZGQ has seen +$86.28 M in net flows, compared with +$14.64 M for GEDG. ZGQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZGQ and GEDG compare?
ZGQ has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while GEDG has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
What are the top holdings of ZGQ and GEDG?
ZGQ's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Apple, Inc.. GEDG's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZGQ or GEDG?
ZGQ holds 470 securities, while GEDG holds 62. On holdings count, ZGQ is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZGQ and GEDG

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds