VS
Compare BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ) vs Manulife Global Edge ETF (GEDG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZGQ provides Information Technology, Health Care, and Communication Services exposures, while GEDG is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, ZGQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.5% for GEDG. Performance-wise, ZGQ has returned 12.87% year-to-date with +$33 M in net flows, whereas GEDG is at 6.33% with +$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZGQ
GEDG
| AuM | $1,232.19 M | $18.94 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.23% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZGQ | +5.65% | +7.31% | +12.87% | +29.15% | +81.35% |
GEDG | +4.46% | +7.19% | +6.33% | - | - | |
| Flows | ZGQ | +$8 M | +$77 M | +$33 M | +$35 M | +$487 M |
GEDG | +$3 M | +$6 M | +$8 M | - | - |
ZGQ vs GEDG exposure
Countries
ZGQ
USA
66.27%
Taiwan
7.19%
Other
26.53%
GEDG
USA
61.93%
Other
8.19%
Other
29.88%
Sectors
ZGQ
Information Technology
37.36%
Health Care
13.16%
Communication Services
12.04%
Industrials
11.63%
Consumer Staples
9.40%
Other
16.41%
GEDG
Information Technology
27.23%
Other
14.00%
Financials
12.86%
Consumer Discretionary
11.66%
Industrials
11.65%
Health Care
9.31%
Other
13.29%
As of May 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZGQ
TWN SEMICONT MAN
5.69%
APPLE
4.74%
META PLATFORMS
4.63%
NVIDIA
4.48%
MICROSOFT-T
3.69%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.72%
LILLY
2.66%
VISA INCORPORATION
2.51%
ASML HOLDING
2.46%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.29%
GEDG
NVIDIA
5.75%
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.56%
MICROSOFT-T
4.11%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.97%
TWN SEMICONT MAN
3.33%
APPLE
2.82%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.65%
JPMORGAN CHASE
2.62%
LILLY
2.31%
CHENIERE ENERGY
2.16%
Diversification
ZGQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 482 total
35.86%
GEDG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 59 total
34.28%
Characteristics
Compare
ZGQ
GEDG
| Provider | BMO | Manulife Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.50% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 5, 2014 | November 24, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZGQ and GEDG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZGQ or GEDG?
As of May 27, 2026, ZGQ has returned 12.87% year to date, while GEDG has returned 6.33%. ZGQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZGQ or GEDG?
As of May 27, 2026, ZGQ manages $1.23 B in assets, while GEDG manages $18.94 M. ZGQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZGQ and GEDG managed?
ZGQ is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI ACWI Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. GEDG is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZGQ and GEDG emphasize?
ZGQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Health Care, and Communication Services. GEDG is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZGQ or GEDG?
Year to date, ZGQ has seen +$32.50 M in net flows, compared with +$7.64 M for GEDG. ZGQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZGQ and GEDG compare?
ZGQ has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while GEDG has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
What are the top holdings of ZGQ and GEDG?
ZGQ's largest holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN and ALPHABET INC-CL. GEDG's top holdings include NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZGQ or GEDG?
ZGQ holds 441 securities, while GEDG holds 56. On holdings count, ZGQ is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZGQ and GEDG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.