ZHY
BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF

Full ZHY fund page
VS
QUIG
Mackenzie US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF

Full QUIG fund page

BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY) and Mackenzie US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (QUIG) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZHY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Industrials, and Energy, while QUIG leans towards Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZHY features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.15% for QUIG. Performance-wise, ZHY has returned 1.49% year-to-date with +$150 M in net flows, whereas QUIG is at 3.03% with +$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.00.51.01.5%Oct 2Oct 9Oct 19Oct 26Nov 2

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZHY
+0.34%-2.40%-1.49%-0.41%+17.91%
QUIG
+1.72%-1.84%-3.03%-2.86%+11.17%
Flows
ZHY
+$34 M+$39 M+$150 M+$304 M+$642 M
QUIG
-$43 M-$68 M+$11 M+$25 M+$175 M

ZHY vs QUIG exposure

Countries

ZHY
USA
88.47%
Other
11.53%
QUIG
USA
92.03%
Other
7.97%

Sectors

ZHY
Finance
18.65%
Industrials
12.33%
Energy
10.81%
Consumer Services
9.13%
Non-Energy Materials
8.64%
Business Services
7.97%
Other
32.48%
QUIG
Finance
47.13%
Technology
16.57%
Healthcare
9.14%
Telecommunications
8.59%
Other
18.57%
As of November 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZHY
CA05584J1012
102.40%
QUIG
Amazon.com, 2.1% 12may2031, USD
1.57%
Anheuser-Busch, 4.7% 1feb2036, USD
1.32%
Bank of America Corporation, 5.015% 22jul2033, USD (N)
1.31%
JP Morgan, 5.299% 24jul2029, USD
1.28%
CVS Health, 3.25% 15aug2029, USD
1.15%
Morgan Stanley, 4.238% 9jan2030, USD (I)
1.13%
Goldman Sachs, 6.75% 1oct2037, USD
1.12%
Wells Fargo, 4.15% 24jan2029, USD (Q)
1.07%
Wells Fargo, 5.605% 23apr2036, USD (W)
0.99%
Goldman Sachs, 3.8% 15mar2030, USD
0.99%

Diversification

ZHY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,041 total
102.40%
QUIG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 401 total
11.93%

Characteristics

Compare
ZHY
QUIG
ProviderBMOMackenzie Investments
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkBloomberg Capital U.S. High Yield Very Liquid CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CADSolactive Select USD Investment Grade Corporate Hedged to CAD TR Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeFixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield6.85%4.71%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 20, 2009January 29, 2018

Frequently asked questions about ZHY and QUIG

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZHY or QUIG?
As of November 2, 2026, ZHY has returned -1.49% year to date, while QUIG has returned -3.03%. ZHY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZHY or QUIG?
As of November 2, 2026, ZHY manages $1.50 B in assets, while QUIG manages $604.87 M. ZHY is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZHY and QUIG managed?
ZHY is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Bloomberg Capital U.S. High Yield Very Liquid CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. QUIG is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive Select USD Investment Grade Corporate Hedged to CAD TR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZHY or QUIG?
ZHY holds 1 securities, while QUIG holds 400. On holdings count, QUIG is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZHY or QUIG?
Year to date, ZHY has seen +$149.60 M in net flows, compared with +$11.19 M for QUIG. ZHY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZHY and QUIG compare?
ZHY has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while QUIG has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What sectors do ZHY and QUIG emphasize?
ZHY is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Energy. QUIG is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.

Recent articles about ZHY and QUIG

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds