ZHY
BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF

Full ZHY fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZHY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Industrials, and Energy, while ZUT leans towards Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZHY features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, ZHY has returned 1.45% year-to-date with +$149 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 18.78% with -$73 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.0%Oct 2Oct 9Oct 19Oct 26Nov 2

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZHY
+0.31%-2.37%-1.45%-0.37%+19.05%
ZUT
+4.23%-1.99%+18.78%+11.65%+68.13%
Flows
ZHY
+$32 M+$38 M+$149 M+$303 M+$642 M
ZUT
-$16 M+$47 M-$73 M-$14 M+$288 M

ZHY vs ZUT exposure

Countries

ZHY
USA
88.47%
Other
11.53%
ZUT
Canada
83.93%
Bermuda
16.07%

Sectors

ZHY
Finance
18.65%
Industrials
12.33%
Energy
10.81%
Consumer Services
9.13%
Non-Energy Materials
8.64%
Business Services
7.97%
Other
32.48%
ZUT
Utilities
83.24%
Energy
8.44%
Industrials
8.32%
As of November 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZHY
CA05584J1012
102.40%
ZUT
Northland Power, Inc.
9.17%
TransAlta Corp.
8.59%
ATCO Ltd.
8.53%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.44%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.43%
Fortis, Inc.
8.34%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.32%
Capital Power Corp.
8.27%
Emera, Inc.
8.26%
Hydro One Ltd.
8.15%

Diversification

ZHY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,041 total
102.40%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.50%

Characteristics

Compare
ZHY
ZUT
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkBloomberg Capital U.S. High Yield Very Liquid CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield6.85%2.80%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 20, 2009January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about ZHY and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZHY or ZUT?
As of November 2, 2026, ZHY has returned -1.45% year to date, while ZUT has returned 18.78%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZHY or ZUT?
As of November 2, 2026, ZHY manages $1.50 B in assets, while ZUT manages $876.51 M. ZHY is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZHY and ZUT managed?
ZHY is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Bloomberg Capital U.S. High Yield Very Liquid CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZHY or ZUT?
ZHY holds 1 securities, while ZUT holds 12. On holdings count, ZUT is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZHY or ZUT?
Year to date, ZHY has seen +$149.08 M in net flows, compared with -$72.83 M for ZUT. ZHY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZHY and ZUT compare?
ZHY has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What sectors do ZHY and ZUT emphasize?
ZHY is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Energy. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.

Recent articles about ZHY and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds