ZLD
BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF

Full ZLD fund page
VS
RID
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF

Full RID fund page

BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLD) and RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF (RID) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZLD focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Telecommunications, while RID leans towards Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZLD features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.49% for RID. Performance-wise, ZLD has returned 6.59% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas RID is at 19.24% with +$206 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.5%Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 8, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZLD
-1.76%+4.97%+6.59%+6.62%+33.79%
RID
-0.81%+6.43%+19.24%+29.40%+94.55%
Flows
ZLD
+$0 M-$6 M+$3 M+$3 M+$2 M
RID
+$17 M+$53 M+$206 M+$269 M+$353 M

ZLD vs RID exposure

Countries

ZLD
Japan
25.72%
United Kingdom
13.95%
France
9.66%
Netherlands
9.62%
Germany
8.49%
Other
32.55%
RID
Japan
21.61%
United Kingdom
12.87%
Switzerland
8.90%
France
8.25%
Netherlands
8.20%
Germany
7.10%
Other
33.08%

Sectors

ZLD
Finance
22.54%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.26%
Telecommunications
10.91%
Industrials
10.43%
Utilities
10.38%
Technology
9.75%
Other
24.73%
RID
Finance
28.39%
Technology
15.40%
Industrials
13.97%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.53%
Healthcare
7.13%
Other
25.59%
As of September 8, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZLD
Orange SA
2.22%
Euronext NV
2.10%
Deutsche Börse AG
1.74%
Central Japan Railway Co.
1.63%
Insurance Australia Group Ltd.
1.59%
Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.59%
SECOM Co., Ltd.
1.58%
SoftBank Corp.
1.50%
KDDI Corp.
1.48%
OBIC Co. Ltd.
1.48%
RID
ASML Holding NV
3.82%
Unilever Plc
3.51%
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
3.37%
ING Groep NV
3.25%
Roche Holding AG
2.77%
Naturgy Energy Group SA
2.75%
Danske Bank A/S
2.68%
Telefónica SA
2.50%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.23%
Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.05%

Diversification

ZLD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 104 total
16.92%
RID
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 105 total
28.94%

Characteristics

Compare
ZLD
RID
ProviderBMORBC Global Asset Management
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.17%2.84%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 10, 2016January 15, 2014

Frequently asked questions about ZLD and RID

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZLD or RID?
As of September 8, 2026, ZLD has returned 6.59% year to date, while RID has returned 19.24%. RID is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZLD or RID?
As of September 8, 2026, ZLD manages $35.11 M in assets, while RID manages $583.06 M. RID is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZLD and RID managed?
ZLD is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. RID is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZLD and RID emphasize?
ZLD is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Telecommunications. RID is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZLD or RID?
Year to date, ZLD has seen +$3.10 M in net flows, compared with +$206.40 M for RID. RID has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZLD and RID compare?
ZLD has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while RID has an expense ratio of 0.54%.
What are the top holdings of ZLD and RID?
ZLD's largest holdings include Orange SA, Euronext NV, and Deutsche Börse AG. RID's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, Unilever Plc, and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZLD or RID?
ZLD holds 104 securities, while RID holds 105. On holdings count, RID is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZLD and RID

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds