VS
BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI) and RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF (RID.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZLI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Telecommunications, and Utilities, while RID.U leans towards Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZLI features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.49% for RID.U. Performance-wise, ZLI has returned 11.73% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas RID.U is at 14.14% with +$25 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZLI
RID.U
| AuM | $294.30 M | $38.47 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.49% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.45% | 0.54% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZLI | +4.91% | +2.15% | +11.73% | +10.88% | +52.69% |
RID.U | -0.32% | -1.38% | +14.14% | +21.36% | +93.76% | |
| Flows | ZLI | +$0 M | -$6 M | -$3 M | -$0 M | -$170 M |
RID.U | -$1 M | +$3 M | +$25 M | +$26 M | +$28 M |
ZLI vs RID.U exposure
Countries
ZLI
Japan
26.37%
United Kingdom
13.71%
Netherlands
9.50%
France
9.19%
Germany
8.86%
Other
32.37%
RID.U
Japan
22.78%
United Kingdom
13.22%
France
8.46%
Germany
7.98%
Switzerland
7.11%
Netherlands
7.02%
Other
33.43%
Sectors
ZLI
Finance
23.25%
Telecommunications
10.92%
Utilities
10.79%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.69%
Industrials
10.16%
Technology
9.69%
Other
24.50%
RID.U
Finance
25.30%
Technology
16.61%
Industrials
15.50%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.66%
Healthcare
8.80%
Other
24.12%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZLI
Euronext NV
2.37%
Deutsche Börse AG
1.99%
Orange SA
1.88%
Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.75%
SoftBank Corp.
1.67%
Nitori Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.58%
Insurance Australia Group Ltd.
1.55%
KDDI Corp.
1.53%
OBIC Co. Ltd.
1.51%
SECOM Co., Ltd.
1.50%
RID.U
ASML Holding NV
4.91%
Roche Holding AG
3.40%
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
3.20%
Unilever Plc
3.19%
Naturgy Energy Group SA
2.81%
BNP Paribas SA
2.54%
Vår Energi ASA
2.27%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.26%
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
2.23%
Danske Bank A/S
2.16%
Diversification
ZLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
17.33%
RID.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
28.97%
Characteristics
Compare
ZLI
RID.U
| Provider | BMO | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.03% | 3.06% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 2, 2015 | January 6, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about ZLI and RID.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZLI or RID.U?
As of October 30, 2026, ZLI has returned 11.73% year to date, while RID.U has returned 14.14%. RID.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZLI or RID.U?
As of October 30, 2026, ZLI manages $294.30 M in assets, while RID.U manages $38.47 M. ZLI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZLI and RID.U managed?
ZLI is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. RID.U is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZLI and RID.U emphasize?
ZLI is most exposed to Finance, Telecommunications, and Utilities. RID.U is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZLI or RID.U?
Year to date, ZLI has seen -$2.96 M in net flows, compared with +$24.73 M for RID.U. RID.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZLI and RID.U compare?
ZLI has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while RID.U has an expense ratio of 0.54%.
What are the top holdings of ZLI and RID.U?
ZLI's largest holdings include Euronext NV, Deutsche Börse AG, and Orange SA. RID.U's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG, and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZLI or RID.U?
ZLI holds 101 securities, while RID.U holds 103. On holdings count, RID.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZLI and RID.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.