ZLI
BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF

Full ZLI fund page
VS
XMI
iShares MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index ETF

Full XMI fund page

BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI) and iShares MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index ETF (XMI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZLI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Communication Services, and Industrials, while XMI leans towards Financials, Industrials, and Consumer Staples. When evaluating costs, ZLI features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.35% for XMI. Performance-wise, ZLI has returned 2.23% year-to-date with +$12 M in net flows, whereas XMI is at 5.31% with -$14 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.5%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 10, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZLI
+1.47%-0.10%+2.23%+1.81%+34.30%
XMI
-0.12%+0.88%+5.31%+10.32%+46.93%
Flows
ZLI
+$9 M+$6 M+$12 M-$29 M-$159 M
XMI
-$0 M-$5 M-$14 M-$7 M-$18 M

ZLI vs XMI exposure

Countries

ZLI
Japan
21.98%
United Kingdom
13.88%
France
12.92%
Germany
9.91%
Netherlands
8.72%
Other
32.59%
XMI
Japan
26.41%
Switzerland
10.89%
United Kingdom
9.94%
Other
52.76%

Sectors

ZLI
Financials
15.23%
Communication Services
13.99%
Industrials
12.06%
Utilities
11.86%
Consumer Staples
11.60%
Health Care
9.69%
Other
25.56%
XMI
Financials
19.00%
Industrials
12.59%
Consumer Staples
10.90%
Health Care
10.66%
Communication Services
9.59%
Utilities
9.07%
Other
28.19%
As of June 10, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZLI
ORANGE
2.14%
NIPPON BUILDING FUND REIT
2.01%
TRYGVESTA
1.70%
KONINKLIJKE AHOLD DELHAIZE NV
1.63%
EURONEXT
1.61%
DEUTSCHE BOERSE AG
1.53%
OBIC
1.46%
TERNA RETE ELETTRICA NAZIONALE
1.45%
SOFTBANK CORP
1.45%
SWISSCOM
1.40%
XMI
ENI
1.68%
TOTALENERGIES SE
1.67%
SHELL PLC
1.57%
EQUINOR
1.56%
IBERDROLA SA
1.51%
DBS GROUP HOLDINGS
1.47%
ORANGE
1.43%
SWISSCOM
1.41%
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL
1.41%
NOVARTIS
1.36%

Diversification

ZLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 102 total
16.37%
XMI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 243 total
15.08%

Characteristics

Compare
ZLI
XMI
ProviderBMOiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - USD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.20%2.56%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 2, 2015July 24, 2012

Frequently asked questions about ZLI and XMI

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZLI or XMI?
As of June 10, 2026, ZLI has returned 2.23% year to date, while XMI has returned 5.31%. XMI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZLI or XMI?
As of June 10, 2026, ZLI manages $286.76 M in assets, while XMI manages $172.81 M. ZLI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZLI and XMI managed?
ZLI is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. XMI is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do ZLI and XMI emphasize?
ZLI is most exposed to Financials, Communication Services, and Industrials. XMI is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Consumer Staples.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZLI or XMI?
Year to date, ZLI has seen +$12.00 M in net flows, compared with -$13.74 M for XMI. ZLI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZLI and XMI compare?
ZLI has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while XMI has an expense ratio of 0.37%.
What are the top holdings of ZLI and XMI?
ZLI's largest holdings include ORANGE and NIPPON BUILDING FUND REIT. XMI's top holdings include ENI and TOTALENERGIES SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZLI or XMI?
ZLI holds 96 securities, while XMI holds 234. On holdings count, XMI is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZLI and XMI

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds