ZLI
BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF

Full ZLI fund page
VS
XMI
iShares MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index ETF

Full XMI fund page

BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI) and iShares MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index ETF (XMI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZLI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Communication Services, and Utilities, while XMI leans towards Financials, Industrials, and Health Care. When evaluating costs, ZLI features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.35% for XMI. Performance-wise, ZLI has returned 1.92% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas XMI is at 5.68% with -$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZLI
+2.76%+0.14%+1.92%+4.21%+27.80%
XMI
+1.71%+3.20%+5.68%+13.77%+41.46%
Flows
ZLI
+$0 M+$6 M+$6 M-$23 M-$169 M
XMI
-$0 M+$0 M-$11 M+$10 M-$22 M

ZLI vs XMI exposure

Countries

ZLI
Japan
22.42%
United Kingdom
13.76%
France
12.31%
Germany
9.91%
Netherlands
8.59%
Other
33.00%
XMI
Japan
27.13%
Switzerland
10.79%
United Kingdom
9.41%
Other
52.67%

Sectors

ZLI
Financials
14.88%
Communication Services
14.29%
Utilities
12.12%
Industrials
11.90%
Consumer Staples
11.81%
Health Care
10.06%
Other
24.94%
XMI
Financials
18.06%
Industrials
12.85%
Health Care
11.09%
Consumer Staples
11.04%
Communication Services
9.63%
Utilities
8.88%
Other
28.45%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZLI
ORANGE
2.15%
NIPPON BUILDING FUND REIT
1.91%
TRYGVESTA
1.74%
KONINKLIJKE AHOLD DELHAIZE NV
1.67%
EURONEXT
1.52%
SOFTBANK CORP
1.46%
TERNA RETE ELETTRICA NAZIONALE
1.44%
SWISSCOM
1.44%
DEUTSCHE BOERSE AG
1.43%
ELISA
1.38%
XMI
ENI
1.72%
EQUINOR
1.70%
TOTALENERGIES SE
1.69%
SHELL PLC
1.65%
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL
1.51%
IBERDROLA SA
1.48%
DBS GROUP HOLDINGS
1.44%
SECOM
1.41%
ORANGE
1.41%
SWISSCOM
1.40%

Diversification

ZLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
16.15%
XMI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 242 total
15.41%

Characteristics

Compare
ZLI
XMI
ProviderBMOiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - USD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.21%2.55%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 2, 2015July 24, 2012

Frequently asked questions about ZLI and XMI

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZLI or XMI?
As of April 24, 2026, ZLI has returned 1.92% year to date, while XMI has returned 5.68%. XMI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZLI or XMI?
As of April 24, 2026, ZLI manages $280.08 M in assets, while XMI manages $175.80 M. ZLI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZLI and XMI managed?
ZLI is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. XMI is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do ZLI and XMI emphasize?
ZLI is most exposed to Financials, Communication Services, and Utilities. XMI is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZLI or XMI?
Year to date, ZLI has seen +$6.16 M in net flows, compared with -$11.35 M for XMI. ZLI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZLI and XMI compare?
ZLI has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while XMI has an expense ratio of 0.37%.
What are the top holdings of ZLI and XMI?
ZLI's largest holdings include ORANGE and NIPPON BUILDING FUND REIT. XMI's top holdings include ENI and EQUINOR.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZLI or XMI?
ZLI holds 97 securities, while XMI holds 233. On holdings count, XMI is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZLI and XMI

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds
Get ETF updates by email

Never miss the latest Canadian ETF Investing news and updates